The Waiting Room: I’ll Take a Side of Empathy with Those Cheerios, Please

The Royal College of Surgeons, Lincoln's Inn Fields, London. Image via Wikimedia Commons.

The Royal College of Surgeons, Lincoln’s Inn Fields, London. Image via Wikimedia Commons.

Kelly Davio’s previous Waiting Room columns for The Butter can be found here.

Last month, my husband had a full week of business meeting at his company’s London office, and I decided to tag along. “Tag along” makes it sound like a small thing to make such a big expedition; in reality, since I got sick, I haven’t traveled very far from my home or my phalanx of doctors. But as I’d been doing reasonably well this spring and had a big heap of unused airline miles, a relatively forgiving workweek, and a passport that was about to expire without a single stamp in it, I decided that the universe was giving me permission to have an adventure more lively than a walk around my neighborhood. Despite the fact that I had to compensate for mobility issues, there is something wonderfully life-affirming about being able to call it “tagging along.”

So tag along I did. One of my favorite tourist behaviors is visiting the stranger museums the world has to offer—ones dedicated to highly specific collections of things I never realized I needed to know about. From whiskey production equipment to apothecary bottles and ritualistic religious paraphernalia, if someone has hoarded it, I want to have a look. So you can imagine my delight when I learned that something called the Hunterian Museum (a facility that Google Maps promised would feature a collection of historical surgical instruments) was just about a block from my hotel.

When I arrived at opening time, I learned that the museum sits inside England’s Royal College of Surgeons. There was some sort of stately academic procession going on inside, with students and professors gathering around in gowns and mothers wearing corsages and looking proud. I skirted around them and into the collection rooms, which I had almost entirely to myself at the early hour. The objects I passed had belonged to John Hunter, a surgeon who, in the 1700s, seems to have developed a number of helpful, forward-thinking surgical practices alongside an enormous collection of pickled specimens. I’m a bit squeamish, so I avoided looking too closely at what was floating in formaldehyde (the primary benefit of having blurry vision much of the time is that it’s hard to gross myself out unless I really work at it).

But past the pickled remains of every kind of mammal and reptile imaginable, toward the back of the wing, was a part of the collection that was disconcerting in a different way altogether. It seems that the doctor enjoyed collecting artwork featuring bodies he considered aberrant. There was a salacious-looking painting of a very fat man. There were portraits of those with genetic mutations or medical conditions that rendered them unusually tall or short. There was a portrait of a woman whom Hunter seemingly took for an medical curiosity solely because she was Malaysian, not English. I was looking, it seemed to me, at Hunter’s own private freak show.

These weren’t artifacts of surgical history, and they had no possible medical value; these were images I could only imagine a roomful of men leering at, joking about. I wondered what Hunter and his cronies must have said about these people whom they thought less than normal, maybe even less than human.

It was almost overwhelming, standing in front of this creepy display by myself. A part of me hoped that someone else would show up in this part of the museum so I could say “this is pretty screwed up, isn’t it?” and get a knowing nod in return.

I didn’t have to wait long for other people to join me in the wing. A few minutes later, some surgical students and their professors wandered in as they waited for whatever ceremony they’d soon take part in. Two young women walked up behind me. The first produced a bag of what appeared to be Cheerios from inside her cloak and began to eat loudly from it. “Oh, you have cereal?” the other said, and dipped a hand in. Crunching followed. A man in a doctoral hood pointed toward part of the exhibit and laughed. “This is wonderful!” he said. Another two students wandered in, discussing how important it was to “always be at the most prestigious places. It’s simply impossible to go from Birmingham to Cambridge!”

I didn’t have to wonder any longer what Hunter and his friends would have said as they stood around his art collection. It probably sounded roughly like what I was hearing around me—the brute ambition, the scoffing, the lack of respect for the fact that we were looking at people, not things. As I listened to them, it occurred to me that a person like me, a body like mine, could easily have been the subject of one of those paintings. I had more in common with those whose bodies were on display for others’ prurient interests than I did with any of the people walking through that museum with me.

I recognize that it takes a tough stomach to be a surgeon, or any kind of physician. The doctors I know in my social circles and in my own family have all developed impressive coping skills that include a hefty dose of gallows humor and an ability to emotionally detach while still showing a kind face to patients. It’s my hope that the same can be said of the doctors and medical students in the museum with me that day, and that they wouldn’t dream of treating their own patients with the kind of crassness they directed at the people pictured in the exhibit. But surely it’s not too much to ask that people—whether doctors or the rest of us hoi polloi—do a bit better than a sack of Cheerios and a guffaw when faced with images that represent a long and terrible history of people being mistreated for their physical differences from the cultural norm. Surely a little empathy isn’t all that much to ask from our fellow human beings.

Tags: , ,

11 Comments

  1. MedStudent +6

    As a med student, I’ve eaten pretzel sticks in a cadaver lab (and I’m not the only one), so I am completely unsurprised that a medical student (especially one in the UK, where they tend to be undergrads) was more excited about cereal than the display of historical lack of respect for anything perceived as “other”

    1. pdavio +3

      I would love to know what, from your perspective, brings about that kind of mentality. Is it the numbing rigor of the academic work you’re doing? The psychological need to disconnect? The overwhelming nature of everything you’re expected to remember/handle/do correctly?

  2. Pear

    Thank you for writing this! Sometimes I wish we could send out some kind of bat signal when we're looking at museums and galleries and realise how the very act of collecting in such contexts is severely fucked up. As you touched on, a lot of the collections are grew from the intellectual and physical products of late C18th – C19th imperialism, with a whole bunch of pseudo-scientific bigotry against the "deviant" (people who have disabilities, aren't white, Christian, etc etc) who needed to be contained through study and conquest.

    I went to the Hunterian myself several years ago and got a guided tour by an old surgeon, a tall, old, impossibly posh white man with an accent as crisp as his shirt collar. He described all the specimens matter-of-factly. He paused by a C18th (I think) portrait of a Black man and said, 'There was a portrait done of this fellow because it was very rare to see a Black in those days; not like now, where you simply have to walk down the tube to see hundreds of them…'

    WELL.

    Also? Dude was wrong. By the 18th century there was a thriving Black community in London because a) though material evidence is scarce and narrative disenfranchisement strong, there have definitely been Black in England since the Roman era b) there was an increase in enslavement and colonial activity–industrialisation was key to imperialism.

  3. Es_Petal +3

    I’ve felt similarly in several museums – there are some things that aren’t spectacles. I felt horribly awkward looking at Lindow Man in the British Museum – he was a *person*, he shouldn’t be spending eternity in a glass case being gawped at. Same in the Cairo museum looking at mummified pharaohs.

    1. pdavio +2

      Interesting that you mention Lindow Man–I also visited him on my trip, and I admit that my response to him was very different. I didn’t feel the same squickiness (though I should have) at viewing his body as I did at viewing, say, Charles Byrne’s skeleton. I need to think more about that…

    2. katenepveu +3

      I was very grateful that the National Museum of Ireland put the bog bodies inside these little spiral-walled enclosures, so you could choose whether to look at them, particularly in light of the descriptions of the violence visible on their bodies.

  4. Kelly Davio

    Interesting that you mention Lindow Man–I also visited him on my trip, and I admit that my response to him was very different. I didn't feel the same squickiness (though I should have) at viewing his body as I did at viewing, say, Charles Byrne's skeleton. I need to think more about that…

  5. Kelly Davio

    I would love to know what, from your perspective, brings about that kind of mentality. Is it the numbing rigor of the academic work you're doing? The psychological need to disconnect? The overwhelming nature of everything you're expected to remember/handle/do correctly?

  6. Kelly Davio

    "Sometimes I wish we could send out some kind of bat signal when we're looking at museums and galleries and realise how the very act of collecting in such contexts is severely fucked up. " << a resounding yes to everything you've said here!

  7. blueathena623 +4

    I would be like those students. It’s a trait I’m working on, but I’m very, very curious by nature, and curious people can become very selfish because they think their curiosity overrides the dignity of others. I become selfish.