The Alchemists at Home: On Pregnancy and Responsibility -The Toast

Skip to the article, or search this site

Home: The Toast

I completely missed the August date for soil testing. Master Gardeners from the University of Rhode Island let you bring soil samples, prepared to their specifications, to the city botanical garden and six other sites to test for pH, heavy metals, and other contaminants and characteristics. What is a contaminant and what is a characteristic is sometimes clear, and sometimes not.

James is scraping down the porch and steps that we unwisely painted with oil-based paint. It’s been shaling off throughout the year, but as he prepares the surface for latex paint, the shreds gather on the ground to the point where I can’t ignore them. I don’t want them to end up in the ocean, so I go outside in the cool late-August morning and gather them one at a time from the concrete.

These little shreds of naptha, toluene, xylene, titanium dioxide, other pigments, and a number of possible extenders including diatomaceous silica, are a drop in the slop bucket of tars and oils and plastics that wash down daily as dust, as grease, as snack wrappers, as scum, in cigarette butts and chewed gum. I can’t even get every scrap off my own pavement, and when the diatoms’ skeletons go back to the sea, they won’t do any good to the other creatures who live there, as they might have before their incorporation in paint.  When the titanium dioxide particles uncouple and sink down, they may have a different power than they did when it was locked in the earth’s crust. Where does this stuff come from, and where does it go?

Two days prior, I sat under our arbor, across from the herbalist with her computer. Grapes fattened incrementally above our heads, drawing up and filtering nutrients from the scraps of our spring meals, traces of lead and other heavy metals from years of paint and manufacturing, broken-down earthworm and insect corpses. Taking notes, she asked about my diet, my bowels, my sources of stress; she asked, very gently, but more than once, if I had a timeline in mind for getting pregnant. I said no, but in saying so realized that I did feel rushed. I wondered out loud if I was making myself a bad home. “I’m actually a very angry person,” I said, laughing.

“Stress does have physical manifestations in the body,” the herbalist said, “but it’s a slippery slope, because it’s easy to fall into the rhetoric of ‘I’m doing something wrong, I’m bad and my body is bad.'” 

Where does this stuff come from, and where does it go? Why do I feel teeth-grinding stabs of anger and call myself names when I move the stove and see how much grime has collected back there, or when I read another article about the rising rate of extinctions? The same response, the same anger! From whom did I receive it, and where can I put it? This feeling of failing, of responsibility, of haste, is not rational, nor is it personal. It’s in the air. It’s in the water.

I want to get pregnant because I want to have a baby, and I want to have a baby because I want to have a child, to be a parent, to share the world. But given what I know about the world I have to share, this may be a bad reason. Why make another hostage to fortune? Why create another drain, another weight, on ecosystems strained by creatures like me? The answer I give first is that I hope it won’t do that. I want to learn and abide by ways of living that won’t be such a strain, that won’t take so much out, that will put back, ways that by the time my child is grown will be easier to use. But that isn’t the full answer; no answer is. There are people I want to make happy, and I don’t even know who all of them are, though I’m pretty sure that one of them is me.  I move from thinking about defending my child against the world’s horrors to showing them its wonders, the way I gave my friend’s son, then three, a tour of the compost pile: “They’re turning food scraps into dirt,” I explained.

“How are they turning it into dirt?”

“The bugs and bacteria that live in there eat it, and then they poop it out, and what they poop is dirt. And then I can give this dirt to my plants and it helps them grow better.” This is a gross oversimplification of what happens in a compost pile, but he seemed pleased, and so was I. So satisfying, the transmutation of matter, the transmigration of lives.

I’ve bought rosewater face spray, honey, peppermint at the Farmacy Herbs stand on market day, but I’ve never been to their premises on Cemetery Street. Today is hot in the sun and cool in the shade. Two women–white, around my age and loosely dressed–sit under an awning, separating stems from leaves. I can go in and measure out what I want, they say. So I do, using a cup measure and a digital scale to fill baggies with raspberry leaf, nettles, oatstraw and lemon balm in the proportions the herbalist prescribed, except that I can’t fit two ounces of nettles into one baggie and I’m too twitchy to start over with a larger one or use another one and I knock over the measuring cup and it falls into a bowl, making a loud sound. On the way out I notice the tangle of mint and milkweed, and hear crickets in the cemetery–the kinds of things I’d point out to a child, if I had one with me.

If I had one, it would gradually fill with petrochemicals, even if everything else went just right, even if none of my nightmares carried it off. My old friend, who I don’t see much anymore, is the kind of parent who fires off diatribes about the dangers of pretzels. I don’t know if I’ll ever be any kind of parent, but I don’t want to be that one. I do understand the desire to stop harm at the very gates of the baby. The baby is closest to you, easiest to reach, to shield; your body’s bigger than its body, you can protect it. The further you go toward the source of the damage, the more you shrink in proportion to it, and the more viciously it fights to protect itself. Will you blow up the paint factory? What about the people whose livelihoods depend on their paint-factory wages, the ecosystems burned or poisoned when the explosion sends paint components into the air and water all at once? Your employer won’t divest from fossil fuel companies: if you bother them about it till you lose your job, who will feed the baby?

This feeling of responsibility is not personal: it is a tactic, designed to protect the doers of harm, the spillers of poison, the devourers. If everything is my fault, nothing is theirs. If I have a baby and she drowns in a flood from an overwarmed ocean, suffers brain damage from lead in the drinking water, ends up malnourished from drought-induced food shortages, you better believe I’ll blame myself. Any parent would. Other parents have.

Researchers at Brown University, where I work, recently released data on common pollutants in the bloodstreams of women of childbearing age. The paper’s title refers to this as a “body burden.” Lead, mercury, and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) can harm fetal and infant brain development; the study investigated the factors that might cause women’s bodies to accumulate more than one, as a prelude to studying interactions between them. 55.8% of childbearing-age women “exceeded the median for two or more of the three pollutants,” also known as xenobiotics–chemicals the body doesn’t make itself. And those are just the ones they tested for.

“Although the study did not measure whether women with higher levels of co-exposure or their children suffered ill health effects,” the study’s author said in an interview, “the data still suggest that women should learn about their risks of co-exposure to these chemicals well before they become pregnant.” A woman who plans to become pregnant in her 30s or 40s, she added, is likelier to have lead, PCBs and mercury in her blood, ready to give away. I am thirty-six. The day I read that article, I walked home through downtown Providence, under three crabapple trees planted in a row near the bus station. They were all blooming. I resented having to exhale, wanting to just breathe in their dusty-sweet smell forever. That’s what’s wrong with humans, I think: we want only to consume, never to relinquish. Or I could point out that my exhaling is part of the problem, that it may be the straw that breaks the cambium layer. My body keeps track of its poisons; I take them in, I serve as their vessel. While they’re in me, they’re not anywhere else, but when I am buried or burned, where will they go—the long synthetic molecules, the isotopes, the comet tails? Nobody wants them.

My body burden came with me and James into the Women and Infants Hospital Center for Reproduction and Infertility; they walked through the bewildering arrangement of offices and interstitial zones paneled in fake wood, and sat down with us as we filled out forms and answered questions and learned about different tests–HIV, syphilis, hepatitis tests for James, and all of those plus hormone levels (estradiol, FSH, thyroid, ovarian reserve–ovarian reserve!–and prolactin) plus a special Ashkenazi panel for me because my dad has the Tay-Sachs recessive. “If you’re trying to get pregnant at home,” the doctor said seriously, “we don’t need to pay attention to all this, but if you come to us, we want to make sure you do it right.”

Back at the house, we giggled about that and groaned about various comments on weight loss and fitness and me being a “good girl” for taking multivitamins, but then I asked, “How much is this something you want because you want it, and how much is it something you want because I want it?”

James said, “It isn’t something I saw as part of my life, because there were things about my family that weren’t the best. But I love you and I trust you, and that’s made certain transformations in me.” Even as I was moved to the core, I wanted to ask, Is it too late to transform some of them back, because this may not work. We may not “get” pregnant, we may not win a child. I’m supposed to call on the first day of my cycle to schedule tests on the third day and a hysterosalpingogram between the fifth and 12th days: “We don’t want to waste time,” they said. “We want to create a healthy baby for you.” Half the time when they thought I was writing down their information, I was writing down their diction.

I catch hold of words and phrases while the big feelings tumble and grind in the ground below me. Mineral spirits: sentient voices of graphite, calcite, granite, basalt, limestone. Ovarian reserve: a protected meadow.

The porch is done, but the steps are still flaking. I suggest we invite people over to help us pick it off: “Lots of people like picking at things,” I say, as if I’m joking, even though I’ve planned it all out in my head: we’d call it a “Picking, Grapes” party, since the grapes will be ready soon and we can’t eat them all ourselves; we’d drink beers and pick at the stoop until it got too dark to see, then move to the backyard, plug in the party lights, stand on chairs and stepladders, spit seeds. “I don’t like the idea of inviting people over to do chores,” James says, and I want to retort, Oh yeah? What about when the baby is born and we haven’t slept in a week and we’re too tired to cook and the house is basically a giant diaper? What if instead of a few years of grease and a layer of wood dust, we had to clean away a layer of toxic mold after a hurricane?

At the moment, there is no baby. At the moment, there is no hurricane.

The herbalist said I should rub oil on my feet before I go to bed, to draw warmth downward and help me sleep. She didn’t say where on my feet, so I put it on the only part of the sole that isn’t dirty. She also says that the first step in becoming a mother is to learn to mother myself. Since today I dug my fingernails into my arms when I couldn’t remember the name of my representative in the General Assembly (it’s John Lombardi, I’ve checked since then) and spent the evening sobbing angrily after James pointed out that I hadn’t closed the window all the way, this instruction may be hard to follow. I’m furious when others are not gentle with me, but feel no obligation to be gentle with myself. Is this how I would treat a child? If it is, I have to face it–like the melting of the permafrost, like the drying of the fertile earth, like the lead under my oiled feet–not in order to despair, but in order to respond.

We try to transform what we receive: this world, stratified in so many beautiful and poisonous ways, and its constant whispers; the things our parents weren’t able or willing to stop at the borders of themselves. We want to know what we should do, but following some of the instructions we hear will sicken us. How many alchemists poisoned themselves with the lead they tried to turn into gold? Research about PCBs in particular introduced me to the term “pseudopersistence”: a substance is pseudopersistent in a given environment if it appears faster than it disappears, if humans keep adding it faster than it can let go of itself, or faster than whoever or whatever else is there can break it into something else. How long for rage? How long for dread? I’ve heard anger referred to as a secondary emotion, a feeling in reaction to another, earlier feeling, like fear. 

Would I stop trying to get pregnant if I found out that my body was, incontrovertibly, a brownfields site? PCBs are associated with low birth weight, which makes children more vulnerable to illness and slower to thrive; we know they cause hearing dysfunction in rats. Lead is a neurotoxin: exposure during pregnancy can cause premature delivery, low birth weight and impaired mental development. Methyl mercury is considered a teratogen, a monster-maker, in the fetal brain.

“The clinical significance of these values is not known,” study authors Marcella Thompson and Kim Boekelheide write. “It is conceivable that the dose threshold for adverse health effects from a combination of these chemicals may be lower and the health effects more severe than those known to be associated with exposure to any individual chemical.” While their study didn’t draw any firm conclusions about race as a factor, we know from other sources that redlining and ghettoization mean poorer people and people of color are more likely to live in environmentally compromised sites, playing on top of former factories and junkyards, drinking poisoned water. Thompson and Boekelheide cite a 2006 article by C.W. Schmidt called “Signs of the Times: Biomarkers in Perspective.” They note, “These findings suggest breastfeeding increases chemical exposures for infants and children while reducing total maternal body burden with a potentially lasting effect.” That’s one reason to have a kid, I guess.

Would I go ahead and have a baby–supposing I can–if I could know for certain that the earth would move beyond human habitability in the kid’s supposed lifetime? What if there was a sixty-percent chance? Forty? 55.8?

If we found out that James and I both have the Tay-Sachs recessive, it would be clear to both of us that we shouldn’t have a baby.

If I can’t stop calling myself a stupid, useless cunt when I get angry, under my breath, through my teeth, should we have a baby?

If we have a baby, I will do so knowing, though maybe not really believing, that a life can be any length.

The lab sheet for my blood tests, unsurprisingly, doesn’t have boxes to check for anger or fear or grief. It also doesn’t have boxes to check for lead, mercury or PCBs: they test only for chemicals that the body makes itself. Before they test my blood, I have to fast; I’m not to “have relations” or take a shower because orgasms or, apparently, drying my breasts can raise the quantities of prolactin that my pituitary gland will release into my bloodstream. I didn’t even know I had this substance in me, more at some times, less at others, delicately charged. Up body, down body, charm body, strange body; body made of parts of everything around it, changing and being changed at all its folded edges, body pressing down on the earth that holds it up.

We can never transform back. We can only transform forward.

*

For further reading:

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/etc.2560/abstract

http://www3.epa.gov/airtoxics/hlthef/lead.html

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/089203629090050M

http://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/0800428/

http://enhs.umn.edu/current/5200/mercury/healtheffects.html

https://news.brown.edu/articles/2012/11/toxicants

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013935112002885

Kate Schapira is the author of six books and eleven chapbooks of poetry. She lives in Providence, Rhode Island, where she writes, teaches, and periodically offers Climate Anxiety Counseling.

Add a comment

Comments (47)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
Holy hell. Right in the gut.
2 replies · active 477 weeks ago
Yeah, very very much so.
55.8% of childbearing-age women “exceeded the median for two or more of the three pollutants” ok feeling like an asshole as I write this, but isn't it the definition of any given median that 50% of the sample will exceed it?

Also this was a very interesting and thought-provoking piece. I would like to have a kid, and also firmly DO NOT wish to know about the contaminants in my body that might harm said kid. I shall keep my head in the probably-toxic sand.
12 replies · active 476 weeks ago
You're not an asshole for pointing that out! I will look at the paper again and try to find out what's happening here/if I'm saying something that doesn't have as much meaning as I thought it did, but I can't do that today. Appreciate the spot-check.
Thanks! Would be interested in hearing what you find out.
Mean = average
Median is the middle value in a set of measurement
Mode is most common value in a set

It is possible for the median to be below the mean if a few very high values skew the mean upwards.
1, 1, 2, 3, 3, 8, 9
Mean is 3.8, median is 3
We can do relative risk next! (i am not fun at parties)
Back to say I did not read your first post closely enough. You are totally right. Median is the middle.
Sorry I went all nerdy there. :/
lol don't worry. (I'm not fun at parties either)
Okay, FINALLY got time to look back at the article.

What I'm seeing here is looking a lot like what Alison wrote below: more than 1/5 of women surveyed had levels above the population median for ALL THREE chemicals, and about 55% of women surveyed exceeded the population median for either 2 out of 3 or all 3.

Thompson and Boekelheide write, "23% of childbearing-aged women had three and another 33% had two xenobiotic levels at or above the median, where one would expect 12.5% and 25%, respectively," which seems to address questions about how what they found differs from the exact median amounts. I think I'm not good enough at this to judge whether those differences are statistically significant.

I'm not sure how/why the population median might differ from the median for the group surveyed (women of "childbearing age").

Does that get people where they need to be?

I ALSO also need to correct a statement in my essay: although these researchers referred to race as "not statistically significant" in this survey, they did observe and note differences in body burdens between women of different races: they write, "The odds of minority women [sic] having two or more of these xenobiotics at or above the median were higher than for non-Hispanic whites."
And remember: all other things being equal, there's a fifty percent chance your child will be below average.
I would guess that the median is for the population in general, not specifically childbearing-age women?
Actually, after rereading I have a new guess. They're saying that there are three separate medians (pollutant 1, pollutant 2, pollutant 3). For each specific pollutant, exactly 50% of the population will be above the median and 50% will be below it, BUT you can be below the median for pollutant 1 and above it for 2 and 3, for example. So the number of women who are "above the median for two or three of the three pollutants" isn't necessarily exactly 50%. It could be less, it could be more, depending on how things fall out.

I threw a ton of random numbers into Excel to convince myself of this. One trial, for example, had 16% of women below all three medians, 30% above 1, 42% above two and 12% above 3, for a total of 54% above two or more.

Whether it is meaningful to say that 54% are above the median for two or more of three pollutants is another question.
Whether it is meaningful to say that 54% are above the median for two or more of three pollutants is another question. yeah, that's kind of what I'm wondering.
The (virtual) company of other numbers nerds fills me with joy.
This captured so much of my ambivalence about my responsibility, first as a potential mother and now as an actual mother, in re: environment and climate, and the total unanswerability of these questions. I didn't get rid of my flame-retardant-saturated sofa; have I condemned my baby to cancer? I took various medications during pregnancy; is it my fault she's slow to gain weight? I haven't solved global warming; what will her world, and that of her children-if-she-has-them, be? I'm grateful beyond the ability of words to express that she's here, yet I worry that I did her a disservice by bringing her into the world at all.
I'm in the beginning stages of figuring out a possible dissertation on the changing moral calculus of childbearing - the idea for which, of course, came out of my own anxieties and those of my peers - so this really resonated for me. Thank you for writing it. I'm also really interested in the idea of "Climate Anxiety Counseling" - I feel like we could all use that.
5 replies · active 477 weeks ago
I would love to read your possible dissertation. That is a big, complicated question.
Perhaps look into Norah MacKendrick's work--she's a sociologist at Rutgers. On motherhood, and contaminants, and cultural norms laid onto motherhood around these issues.

More here: “More Work for Mother: Precautionary Consumption as a Maternal Responsibility. In. Gender & Society.
Awesome, thank you for the tip!
Not gonna lie--the environmental impact of having a kid is one of the big indelible marks in the "hell no" column for me. (There are others--but it's in the top five.)

No matter how careful you are, a human being still has to eat, still has to get from point a to point b, still moves through the world we've made, and that means consuming resources that can't be replaced, and as Americans we end up consuming more than our fair share. I can't justify that.
This is a great illustration of what I'm talking about! On the one hand, we have the dominant moral concern in this piece, which is a concern about the harm that the world will do to our children; and on the other, we have the concern expressed in your comment, which is about the harm that our children will do to the world. (They often seem to go hand in hand, since environmental concerns are a big part of both.) I'm interested in what leads these concerns to be culturally important, and how people navigate them, or set them aside completely, in reproductive decision-making.
this was so gorgeous. pulling together the universal and the personal, because we live here and so it's all personal, and we live here, so our personal all becomes universal.

as someone raised entirely in cities - and currently living in a nice leafy neighborhood spitting distance from two major freeways - I wonder sometimes about the things hiding merrily in my bloodstream.
lyricalikons's avatar

lyricalikons · 477 weeks ago

Oh my God, this piece. So, so good, thank you for writing it.

I also have a harsh inner voice to myself. Sometimes I hear it leaking out when I my son, like, he's so close to me that I occasionally say to him the harsh things I say to myself. (Just try harder. It doesn't matter how you feel, do it anyways. It's your fault because you weren't paying attention.)

That does happen, especially when I'm tired, but more often, I catch myself learning to be more gentle with myself because I've practiced being gentle with my son. (I know you worked hard on this and did your best. You'll feel better after you eat something. It's ok to cry.) I never knew how to say these things to myself until after I had a child.

I guess for me, becoming a mother was the first step in learning how to mother myself, and I'm very grateful for that. I still screw it up all the time but it's so much better than I thought it would be.
1 reply · active 477 weeks ago
Thank you extra for this generous response.
Wow. Beautiful piece. The degree to which women are expected to protect our wombs as safe harbours for babies-that-may-be is insidious.

Just this weekend my dad was asking if I (neither pregnant nor planning to be) should be taking a planned trip to the southern hemisphere because of the Zika virus. Because what if?

During my own pregnancies, I scoffed at prohibitions on deli meats but panicked when a leak caused a very small amount of mould in my home, which we immediately dealt with. My hypocrisy with respect to my body burden knows no bounds.
2 replies · active 477 weeks ago
It's not hypocrisy to decide that some things are cause for concern and some aren't!
Love the Tombstone reference, tho. I think that is my favorite Val Kilmer role. 💗
Everything about anger. I worry so much less about the external world than the internal one. But I worry about the internal one almost without pause.

This was beautiful, beautiful, beautiful. Thank you for writing it.
Lovely piece, Kate--reached it through a link from a colleague. Chiming in here to say how important it is to have the human experiences of this modern predicament be articulated. So much of this knowledge appears as numbers and data, and lost are the people and communities whose lives/bodies/altered futures those numbers represent. I am an environmental sociologist trained (at Brown) and have worked on the kinds of studies you cite--collaborating on exposure assessments even as I wrote about the history of body burden/biomonitoring. What strikes me about the comment thread above is how easy it is to take as inevitable that these materials are in bodies and passed forward. The reality is that many of the chemicals that can bioaccumulate are only three or four generations old... PCBs, for example, first came off the production line just before the Great Depression set in. These were not in my great grandmother's womb when she gestated my grandmother, but they were present during my mother's gestation in the 1940s and mine in the 1970s and certainly in my sons when I carried them in the 2010s...
1 reply · active 477 weeks ago
Thank you, Rebecca, for your response and for your work, too! I would love to talk with you about the strengths and weaknesses of "humanizing" science and social science, if you want--it's something I think about a lot and try to work with (what needs to be data, what needs to be narrative).

And your point about the relatively recent presence of these compounds and chemicals is also really key, both in thinking about recent history and thinking about what we're continuing to put in, and how long it will stay.
This is a really great piece, thank you for writing it.
"I’m furious when others are not gentle with me, but feel no obligation to be gentle with myself."

Ohhhhhhh. That hurts. That hurts a lot. So painfully relevant right now.
I just wanted to thank all of you who've read so far, and responded here. Knowing that other people think and feel about this, and WHAT you think and feel, is powerful and important, and I'm glad I said it in a way that felt right to many of you, and I hope it also feels good (in context) to hear from each other. And I'm also super grateful to the self-described numbers nerds, truly, because it's not enough for the feeling to be right--the meaning has to be right, too!
1 reply · active 477 weeks ago
This is a beautiful and moving piece. Sometimes when something resonates emotionally (especially when uncomfortable emotions arise) it is easier for me to focus on the numbers. I realize after some thought that focusing on numbers and the like rather misses the point of the piece. Deciding whether or not to have children is a bigger, thornier question than can be answered by math. Feelings and values are going to be the most important factors.
This is an extraordinarily good bit of writing, and I don't have anything else to say that won't bubble over and become thousands of too-much words. Thank you for writing it. So, so- "good" is the wrong word; but I haven't got any others. Powerful? Powerful will do.
Thank you so much for writing this - it resonated.
Thanks for the wonderful piece. I have to admit that I hesitated before clicking because I am 13 1/2 weeks pregnant and can get myself into a terrible worry spiral when it comes to the destruction of our environment, communicable diseases (both mosquito-borne and otherwise), the increasing inefficacy of antibiotics... And, as a paranoid pregnant person, there is such an added responsibility because everything I breathe, touch, eat, absorb through my skin isn't just affecting me anymore, it is the first exposure that a brand new human is getting to the toxic world. But unlike something from the CDC or the panicked ravings of a pregnant woman on Babycenter.com (enter only if you dare), this was lovely and thoughtful and humanizing, and reassures me in my imperfectness. Thank you.
This... It's like you are in my head. I'm learning how to "mother" myself, and not turn my anger at others onto myself, and how to not harm myself when I feel like I should be better, stronger, more capable. My husband doesn't want to "try" for kids until I learn these things - in his parlance, until I am "stable." I try to tell him I am "unstable" for good reason, and that I have never felt, nor will I ever feel, entirely "stable." That all I can do is aim to be stable enough. That my therapist says I am stable enough. That his daughter sure as hell thought I was stable enough. That he thinks I am stable enough 99.9% of the time. That no one can be perfect all the time, and that includes me, and that includes him. That our life together will never be perfect. Ever.

I try to tell him that until his daughter is living with us, or at least near enough that we can visit more frequently (as opposed to never) and we know that she is stable enough (as opposed to battling psychological wounds from years of abuse and manipulation), I will not be fully stable. I want to tell him that I know this may never happen. That even if she comes home tomorrow and we get her the best care possible, it will take years to undo the damage that has been wrought. That I can't imagine what life will be like when I'm trying to be stable enough while ensuring an angry 8-year-old doesn't harm herself or others, that she feels safe and loved, that she has a stable home. I can't imagine giving her less than 100% of what I have, of what I am, and I can't imagine trying to do that while pregnant. I can't imagine trying to do that while having an infant. But I know I want children that I nourish and protect and carry in my body. I know that the love I feel for a child that isn't mine is all-encompassing, and I am curious as to how that intense love will transform when I have a child born of my body.

I am also terrified that I can't be a mother to more children because of the scars I bear from an ongoing fight to protect and love my husband's child.
2 replies · active 477 weeks ago
I'm sorry that you are in this difficult situation. I'm glad that you have a therapist to help you work through this. (toast hugs)
That sounds so hard, and like it feels so traplike. I'm sorry, and I wish you well.

Maybe one thing to think about is that learning to be gentle with yourself/practicing kindness toward yourself will be a good thing even if it doesn't make anything else happen (having a child you love come and live with you, giving birth to a child, proving anything to anybody), because it will make your life a better place to be, and that is important.
Kate, you know I love this; thank you for writing it.

Somehow I only noticed this part, though, when I went to grab an excerpt for Toast Points:

Why do I feel teeth-grinding stabs of anger and call myself names when I move the stove and see how much grime has collected back there

ARE YOU SUPPOSED TO DO THIS A LOT
2 replies · active 476 weeks ago
...I do this.

I have to distinguish types of cleaning with my husband--I call this kind "fruit at the bottom of the bowl" after the Ray Bradbury story, wherein a murderer is caught because he becomes obsessed with cleaning the entire house after he commits his crime.

It feels like a personal failing on my part if there is dust behind my sofa, or if my stove isn't spotless. ...But I'm not as bad as my mom? Who cleans her whole house, including the miniblinds everyday.

Sometimes it's easier to direct anger at myself for something I *can* do something about, like cleaning, instead of the hopeless rage that can come from things I *can't* do anything about.
I would have died without ever doing it if we hadn't sanded the counters down (in order to refinish them), gotten some sawdust back there, and given me visions of grease/sawdust/electrical fires.

Could that even happen? I don't know!

The rest of the time I, as my mother puts it, "clean the middles of things," so if you're supposed to do this often, I'm not doing what I'm supposed to do.
I read this pregnancy testing blog and this article explain pregnancy process in full detail and also tell me what to do after 30 weeks in pregnancy thanks for share it Joyce Hill .
نجدد ترحابنا بكم في العاب بنات التي تعتبر من افضل الالعاب على الاطلاق وعندها جمهور كبير جدا وهي بدورها تتضمن التلبيس والمكياج وكذلك الطبخ وتلعبها البنات بكترة واصبحت مشهورة جدا في السنين الاخيرة مما جعل مواقع الالعاب تصبح كتيرة وهناك كتير منها مشهورة متل فرايف و كيزي ومواقع اخرى كما ان هناك ايضا موقع جميل عربي يقدم تشكيلة من العاب بنات مميزة ومتجددة يوميا هذا النوع بدوره يشمل اصناف كتيرة سنتعرف عليها الان ومن بينها العاب الطبخ الدي يملك معجبين كتر جدا ويعتبر هو الاول تم يليه العاب التلبيس وهذا الآخر ممتع ويحبه الكتير لان التلبيس تعشقه البنات اكتر من الاولاد وهذا امر بديهي ومعروف وبعده بالتتابع يوجد العاب المكياج او الميك اب نوع جميل ومحبوب عند الصغار والكبار ويبقى في الاخير نوع قص الشعر وهو الاقل اهتماما

Post a new comment

Comments by

Skip to the top of the page, search this site, or read the article again