A Love Letter To the Hood -The Toast

Skip to the article, or search this site

Home: The Toast

This is a love letter to the inner city. This is a love letter to a concept of Chicago that is constantly under attack. This is a love letter to the people in the hood who raised me, sustained me, and supported me.

I’ve been trying to write about Chicago violence for a good two months now. The facts are easy to obtain from any major news source, though the way in which those facts are presented leaves a lot to be desired. Context matters, though, and it appears to be completely missing from most discussions concerning my city. If you were to take a map of Chicago marked with the neighborhoods with the highest rates of violence, and overlay it with a map of school closures, you might begin to see a pattern. Add in yet another map of cuts to public transit–including the decisions to shut down train lines for repairs for months or years at a time–and a picture emerges of neighborhoods that have been systematically isolated.

Experts on Chicago (who often are neither from Chicago or remotely educated about Chicago politics or Chicago history), often disparage the people in the community. And no, I’m not making excuses for gang violence. But when we talk about violence in the communities where gangs are most common, we have to talk about the economics of crime. We have to talk about the impact of poverty, of police brutality, of school closures, of services being cut over and over again to these neighborhoods. We have to talk about the impact of racism on wealth building in communities of color. We have to talk about politicians who think the solution to crime is to throw civil liberties out the window. We have to talk about why the institutional reaction to white-on-white violence was settlement houses, while the institutional reaction to violence in predominantly Black and Latino communities is to bring in the National Guard.

It’s easy to forget that the people living in those neighborhoods are more complex than a sound bite, when those sound bites are often all that make it into the mainstream media. There’s this idea that the community is responsible for fixing itself, as though these things are happening because the people living there have dozens of choices and they choose the ones that leads to violence.

Discussions of mental health issues–like post-traumatic stress disorder–stop when race and crime enter the equation. Yet we know that kids who witness violence early in life are more likely to struggle with depression, anxiety, and yes, PTSD. We know that the kids who join gangs often come from unstable homes. Yet all too often, sympathy for the victims is as minimal as it is for the people doing the shooting. When you look at comments on articles about gun violence here, the racists usually come out to play. They’re happy to lambast poor people of color for living in the only places they can afford in a rapidly gentrifying city where rents have more than tripled in the last 15 years.

When discussions start about “those people,” I am always aware that I am one of those people. I call it “hood made good” because–like a lot of the people I grew up with–I know what it’s like to be poor in dangerous areas, and have to navigate the reality that the police aren’t there to protect and serve you. To know that some of your neighbors are both a problem and a solution. Community policing is a joke in a city where calling the cops might get you help, or might get you killed.

That’s before we get into the reality of poverty, and how often crime is all that’s paying the most basic of bills in homes teetering on the edge of collapse. Survival demands certain hard choices, and while I have the privilege of not having to face those choices myself, I come from a family that faced them for me.

Chicago can be a hard city to love, especially in the depths of a violent summer. But make no mistake; the hood is not a cancer to be cut away. The hood needs healing and access to resources and opportunities that have vanished with each wave of gentrification. Want to stop the violence in Chicago? Save Chicago from a long slow decline into whatever post-apocalyptic wasteland is most popular in the imaginations of those who speak of sending armed troops into faltering neighborhoods? Stop trying to fight fire with fire, and start fighting it with the water of access and opportunity. The violence is the symptom, but poverty is the disease. Attack it with quality schools, health care for bodies and minds, jobs that pay living wages, public transit, open libraries, community centers, and policing strategies that don’t involve brutality.

Instead of spending taxpayers’ dollars to pad the wallets of wealthy institutions, polish up schools that are still brand new, spend that money in the hood. Commit to helping not just this generation, but the next several generations so “hood made good” is not the exception. I succeeded because of the sacrifices made on my behalf; I make sacrifices for my community; but this is not an individual problem. This is a structural problem that dates back generations. From the riots of 1919 to the abuses of the ’80s to the brutality of today, the hood in Chicago has been under attack longer than most of us have been alive.

A people under siege cannot, will not be able to achieve their full potential. Chicago needs to write a love letter to itself.

Mikki Kendall: Writer, Occasional Feminist, co-creator of Hood Feminism.

Add a comment

Comments (37)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
Arin Arcady's avatar

Arin Arcady · 600 weeks ago

Not to preempt Ms. Kendall, who I'm sure has some amazing thoughts on this, but my understanding is that there are two problems: (1) it's easy to circumvent Chicago's gun control laws by bringing guns in from other states; and (2) it's unclear what gun control laws are constitutional. Very hard to figure out how to get around these, absent some huge national shift on gun rights sentiment.
<3 <3 <3

Thank you for writing this piece and articulating this frustration.
Exoduster's avatar

Exoduster · 600 weeks ago

I love that you have so elegantly voiced something that I've struggled to articulate in the past. I am becoming so very tired of the paternalistic tone that many people are taking when discussing this issue. So much enmity in a situation that is lacking equity and empathy.
So excited to see Mikki Kendall on here!
This was so beautiful. Thank you for writing it.
chickpeas's avatar

chickpeas · 600 weeks ago

I have the privilege of not having to face those choices myself, I come from a family that faced them for me.

thank you for making this point, and making it so eloquently. I have been struggling to articulate this for some time. We may well be condemning people today for choices that in 20 years, some outside observer, some future version of me, will say, well, I'm so glad that so and so's parent(s) sacrificed (in whatever way) or made (xyz risky/questionable decision) so they could have a future.

I have loved/still love a hard to love city, a punchline city, though I didn't grow up there and I don't live there now.

Thanks for writing this.
This was well-written. Thank you for telling your story. I live in close proximity to Camden, NJ, one of the poorest and most violent cities in the country; whereas in the same county there are plenty of affluent suburbs only a few miles away. It's heartbreaking.
This is such a great piece! I especially love that eloquent use of map comparison that say about a million words put together.
Christine's avatar

Christine · 600 weeks ago

So many posts about Chicago. Can we have a Toast Chicago meetup? Pretty please?
While walking about downtown, I often wonder if I'll run into Ms. Kendall so I can thank her in person for her writing.
2 replies · active 600 weeks ago
I have this thought very frequently.
Let me guess, that DePaul arena would be funded by a TIF? OF COURSE!! Until Chicago does away with an system that allows the mayor to siphon off tax dollars and use it to build his own private slush fund, financial parity in Chicago will always be effed. Thank you so much for this essay, it was terrific.

For non-Chicagoans, here's more about the insane TIF program.
2 replies · active 600 weeks ago
The city is supposedly broke-assed broke right now. They've scaled back on all kinds of things, closing schools, laying off teachers. AND YET: I live in a wealthy neighborhood. We moved here three years ago, near a train track (note: it's elevated, but not Metra or the El). At first, we breathed a sigh of relief when we found out the track was abandoned, as we would not have to be woken up/interrupted by the noise of passing trains. Fast forward to the last year or so and Rahm magically conjured up tens of millions of dollars to make The 606 (http://the606.org/). It's a linear, elevated park not unlike New York's High Line. It will run ~3 miles, connecting northwest neighborhoods, many of which are quite wealthy, and it will open in less than a year. Don't get me wrong: it's great for our property value (I threw up in my mouth just typing that). We're less than a 100 feet from the tracks and only a couple hundred yards from its starting point. But right now? When parts of the city are on fire? What in the effing eff is this?
Can I encourage you to tell your alderman or the mayors office that you think that? That as a resident of this neighborhood, who stands to benefit from this line, you think the money should go elsewhere? They do take that thing semi-seriously.
I can try. The thing that sort of blew my mind is that we had no inkling that any of this was in the works. I'm not saying that we're hardcore activists or anything, but we do try to be aware of what's going on in the city. The first word we heard of it was that Rahm already had the money set aside. It seems like it's a fait accompli, but you are right that I should at least try.
Holy shit, I also live here and haven't heard anything about this. Since when are Wicker Park, Bucktown, and Logan Square "ethnically and economically diverse?" Is this park being developed in the 1970s?
"The violence is the symptom, but poverty is the disease. Attack it with quality schools, health care for bodies and minds, jobs that pay living wages, public transit, open libraries, community centers, and policing strategies that don’t involve brutality."

This is so incredibly on point and so perfectly common sense - why it isn't happening is beyond me.
I may have squealed when I saw the byline. Thank you, Mikki, for sharing this here!

The violence is the symptom, but poverty is the disease. Attack it with quality schools, health care for bodies and minds, jobs that pay living wages, public transit, open libraries, community centers, and policing strategies that don’t involve brutality.

This, this, this, a thousand times. I spent two very happy years in Chicago, but it was also very clear that my experience, gainfully employed in a neighborhood that had these resources, was a whole different world than for many people living there.
"Discussions of mental health issues–like post-traumatic stress disorder–stop when race and crime enter the equation. Yet we know that kids who witness violence early in life are more likely to struggle with depression, anxiety, and yes, PTSD. We know that the kids who join gangs often come from unstable homes. Yet all too often, sympathy for the victims is as minimal as it is for the people doing the shooting. When you look at comments on articles about gun violence here, the racists usually come out to play."

I want to quote the whole thing, but yes yes yes. This is so true. I'm so tired of the media explanation that white people commit crimes because they're mentally ill, but people of color commit (and are victims of) crimes because they are people of color.

This is an incredible piece -- thank you.
2 replies · active 599 weeks ago
It would be nice if white Chicagoans had changed more since the '80s when Lenita McClain wrote "How Chicago Taught Me to Hate White People."
Wow... I had never read that, and I wasn't familiar with Ms. McClain. Thanks for sharing that.
Holy shit. That is appalling.
I've never read this either but I'm going to start sharing it far and wide- Thank you so much for bringing this into the conversation.
Chicongo????? I was born in the Chicago 'burbs in 1986 and somehow never heard this story, of how an election so violently divided the city... my mother is a bit of a casual racist so I could never ask her about it, but now I'm really dying to know more. That article was amazing and so sad.
I learned about this piece from "Fire on the Prairie," which isn't the best written (the writer can't seem to get into a long-form journalism mindset) but does teach you a lot about the time.
I once spoke to a professor about an idea for a paper on Chicago transit disparity. He snidely informed me that the North and South sides of the city have the same number of train lines so there was no disparity.

Except the exact same train line (red) stops every 2-4 blocks on the north side and only every mile or so on the south side. Except all train lines are designed to transport (white, north side/suburban) business people to their jobs in the loop so that those people can take one direct route instead of 2 buses and a train. Except the south and west sides are significantly bigger areas than the north side yet do not have proportionate transit options (though the CTA maps are not to scale and so give the impression of equitable coverage by making all the areas look equally sized).

Sorry for ranting about a tangent here. This was a great article about a city which is indeed really hard to love most of the time.
2 replies · active 600 weeks ago
Just in case people didn't follow the links, the big story right now in transit is that perhaps the busiest line of the El -- the Red Line -- is undergoing track repairs on the south side (i.e., the poorer, less white side of town). The trains have been closed entirely and will remain so for somewhere around six months. The argument was that the repairs could be done more quickly and possibly for less money. The thing is, there have been track repairs in wealthy areas of the city for YEARS and they always alway always just go to single track or night-time closures. Because White People and Wealthy People would never stand to be herded onto buses. It's so blatant, it really is almost breathtaking.
I see the same thing happening here in Boston. The Red Line near Mattapan gets shut down for months for repairs, (at least with bus service replacing it, but still), but the Red Line that goes through more affluent neighborhoods only gets closed on the weekends.
Thank you for this.
It'd be interesting to see writing about gun violence/control from this perspective. Most of what I've seen is about how to control assault weapons but the problem of hand guns and the types of weapons used in gang violence seem like they should be a more pressing issue, since it's happening on a daily basis. I mean I know why it usually isn't brought up, re: racism, classism, the idea that the violence is inevitable. The fact that it is actually a tough question that would make us consider all the inequality mentioned in the article, which is not a popular topic. UGH. Sorry.
Anyway, I'm very excited to see more writing on this. (It's implied at the start that there is more to come right?)
This piece is a moving and insightful contribution to the open question of what Chicago is, what it could be, and who can claim status as a legitimate inhabitant of the place. Thank you, Ms. Kendall. I love the city, but I think every single day about how crazy-fortunate I am to have access to the specific portion of it where I live and how my experience diverges from the experiences of most of my students.

I hope that someone with an inclusive vision and fewer ties to wealth unseats Rahm in 2015. I'd knock on doors for Toni Preckwinkle.
Excellent excellent piece. So incredibly incisive. I hope we see more from Mikki on the Toast, and I'll be following Hood Feminism avidly.
I love this city desperately, but Chicago is ground zero for the dismantling of public education nationwide. Democrats haven't just abandoned the field on quality education for all, they've picked up the ball and run it repeatedly into their own end zone. Arne Duncan on the national level. Rahm Emanuel here. They are systematically defunding and closing schools in poorer, blacker areas, and outsourcing public education to private sector charters, lining the pockets of millionaires and buying votes with palatial magnet and charter schools in wealthier, whiter areas. What little perceived success charters achieve is but a mirage, driven by keeping kids segregated from Those People, and those kids who are poorer, with less-involved parents, or who live further away. This system's success is predicated upon making it further and harder and more complicated and more expensive for the people who need it most to find their way to a quality school. And it is shameful.

My wife and I are immigrants, raising a biracial child in one of the most segregated cities in the country. We've been here thirteen years and we're still navigating the minefield that is race. I'm not so sure we want to get fully assimilated on that dimension of the culture. That alone may end up driving us home. It wears you down, after a time.
2 replies · active 600 weeks ago
Thank you for bringing this up, and thank you for navigating that minefield. I bet you're making a net positive difference, even if it feels like a slog.

What's happened/happening with public education funding and support in general is a huge fucking disgrace, and the Chicago school system specifically does seem like a bellwether for the rest of the country, sadly. We just took our first step toward the charter school model here in Washington State last November, much to the chagrin of many of us who actually work in and on the fringes of public education.

The current federal government shutdown is, of course, outrageous, preposterous theatre that is affecting the welfare of millions of Americans. But let's not pretend this is the first we're seeing of it; a slow but massive shutdown has been chipping away at our school districts, our prison systems, our welfare and food stamp system, our firearm controls, our food safety system, our environmental protection models, etc., for a long time. Not uniformly, and not always with the success the dismantlers hope for, but that shit is real and it is frightening.
I know this is a late comment, but I just wanted to say how much I agree with you. The sequester was already doing a lot of damage even before this latest ridiculous shutdown.This systematic dismantling of any sort of social safety net is exactly what the Reagan Revolution was about, and the only Democratic presidents we've had since then have only been able to slow it down a little, not really reverse it. I'm sure a lot of the real opposition to the ACA -- from people who actually have power, like the Koch Brothers -- comes from a horror at seeing ANY government program actually be successful, after they've spent billions convincing people that "government IS the problem."
Thank you for writing this. Living in Chicago, I am constantly hearing (young, usually white) people grouse about how "sketchy" this or that area is, or how "dangerous" things can be. The biggest concerns, of course, come not from the slightly naive and racist white Chicagoans I know, but from the much more cloistered and racist suburbanites I left behind in Ohio. Roger's Park, Edgewater, Uptown, and especially Logan Square are all undergoing a sickening gentrification process that is pushing local families and business out. I try to remind people that the crime rate is really not that high, and that the risk of being victimized is lower than the risk of, say, being mowed down by one of Chicago's overworked, exhausted cab drivers, but no one is ever convinced.

Post a new comment

Comments by

Skip to the top of the page, search this site, or read the article again