Some Thoughts on the 2015 Oscar Nominees -The Toast

Skip to the article, or search this site

Home: The Toast

If the Oscars weren’t relevant, they wouldn’t exist. We wouldn’t talk about them. We wouldn’t watch the broadcast. E! wouldn’t dedicate exhaustive coverage to the ceremony before, during, and after. We wouldn’t offer up our opinions. We wouldn’t be disappointed when our favorites are overlooked. Certainly, the Oscars are irrelevant to many people but they are relevant to me. Why? I love movies. I love the idea of Hollywood. I love what lurks beneath that idea. I love the idea that excellence can be rewarded.

I want to write movies. I will write movies. I want to know there is no limit to the potential of a movie I write. I want to know I can write parts for people with brown skin or unruly bodies or thick accents or breasts and know that people will recognize the importance of the stories those people have to tell. We don’t write to win awards or nominations but no one wants to write into a culture where our stories will never be recognized as excellent when they are told in excellent ways. No one wants to be encouraged to grow, but only so far as to reach an obdurate glass ceiling, and no farther.

There is a pithy shorthand that emerges every awards season about who was “snubbed” or overlooked. Sometimes, this shorthand is used appropriately, sometimes it is not. However, when you look at every single category  and see only white people being rewarded, something has been snubbed.

I will also note that it is interesting that many people are overlooking the fact that there is one tiny spot of color–the writer and director of BirdmanAlejandro González Iñárritu, is Mexican.

I don’t begrudge the nominees of any of the categories though there is one Best Picture nominee, The Grand Budapest Hotel, that makes me shake my head, simply because it isn’t my kind of movie. It is frustrating, though, particularly in looking at the Best Picture nominees, to see what kind of story is resonating with Academy voters. With the exception of Selma, these are movies about white men coming of age, coping with old age, coping with genius, coping with a strong mind but frail body, coping with the burdens of patriotism and duty, and on and on.

These stories deserve to be told but they are not the only stories that deserve to be told. This is what we continually lose sight of. And in Selma, which is an outstanding movie, we see, yet again, the kind of story Academy voters are comfortable with when it comes to people of color–always about the history, about the struggle. Where is the Birdman for an aging Asian actress? Where is Girlhood, ambitiously chronicled over a number of years? Where is the twee movie shot in highly saturated color about a woman working as a hotel concierge? These stories exist and if they don’t they have the potential to exist, if there were more opportunities available. There would be more opportunities available if when these stories were made, and made well, they were recognized because then studios would be more inclined to support similar work. It’s a vicious cycle that could be a lot less vicious if the right people stuck their necks out.

Add a comment

Comments (35)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
Alejandra's avatar

Alejandra · 532 weeks ago

Yeah, but that Alejandro González Iñárritu is Mexican doesn't necessarily give the list colour. The guy's white presenting. He's obviously not indigenous.
3 replies · active 532 weeks ago
Alejandro isn't White/Anglo and he isn't known as "El Negro" because of his hair.
The way Latin@s present racially in our own countries is not always the way they see us in the United States.
I'm very pleased to see Hispanic directors having success in Hollywood.
AMEN, Roxane.
Very, very well said. Will refer anyone who doesn't get it to this article.
I have written and erased several borderline creepy comments about how I love everything you write about anything. Ummm, I just think you're great. K, bye *awkward wave*
3 replies · active 532 weeks ago
I feel the EXACT same way, katiemac!
friendship through mutual obsession!
There is nothing creepy about loving Roxanne Gay. I'm with you, katiemac!
Thank you, Roxane.

I want to direct a lot of people I know to read this piece--specifically, the ones who make the predictable comments about "who cares, it's just a bunch of rich people giving each other awards" and "who cares about Hollywood when PEOPLE ARE DYING" and so on. These types of award nominations (and wins) can be awfully...telling. This year especially.
"Women's stories" used to dominate American cinema, including the awards, but they seem to have been losing ground since the fifties. Those "maverick" directories of the sixties and seventies? Most of them were telling white-man stories, with a few notable exceptions, at least in terms of decent parts for women: actors' directors with strong backgrounds in theatre, like John Cassavetes and Paul Mazursky, come to mind.

It is funny AND sad how far ahead television (formerly known as "the boob tube") is in terms of stories about women, people of color, and GLBTQ, although simply featuring those people on your show isn't enough.

I haven't watched the Oscars in years and I pay only passing attention to any writing about them: the nominees, for the most part, are not in my sphere of interest. I think it was Roger Ebert who wrote that (Hollywood) movies used to be aimed at "everyone," and that's simply not the case any more. You can question the use of the word "everyone" and you'd be right to do so, but the money behind Hollywood movies doesn't seem to care whether there's broad-based appeal to a film or not. Just suck 'em in on opening weekend and that's enough.

Very much looking forward to seeing "A Girl Walks Home Alone at Night" this weekend. "Theory of Everything"? Didn't even consider seeing it, although seeing Julianne Moore get recognition is delightful.

I wonder if Nia Vardalos could even get "My Big Fat Greek Wedding" made today. That was only a decade ago.
The AV Club also posted a great article about this, that gave a lot of facts and figures: http://www.avclub.com/article/selmas-snubs-speak-...

I thought it was also a good one to send to people who didn't think it was a big deal.
My thoughts around this are a giant swirling maelstrom and quite incoherent. But.

The Academy's demographics being what they are (2014 numbers), I guess I should never be surprised. The optimist in me expects/hopes for better, though. The realist pats her on the shoulder and says, I'm sorry.

When people say it doesn't matter, it makes me sad, because they're really not understanding the importance of representation on the screen as well as behind the camera in the big-shot jobs. Nor are they getting that "Oscar-nominated" (never mind -winner!) is going to go a long way towards them getting good projects in the future, never mind funding for those productions. It has ramifications, being ignored/snubbed. I've long wished I had been able to be a director or producer, and maybe could have tried my best to make a bit of difference in what was in those flickering images.
1 reply · active 531 weeks ago
When people say it doesn't matter, I usually say RIGHT! It doesn't matter. That's why you should see more diversity because that would be the natural order of things. All white means it still does matter.
I really appreciate this article. It really articulates the way that I have felt that I couldn't explain well. "These stories deserve to be told but they are not the only stories that deserve to be told." should be the rally cry of people everywhere.
1 reply · active 532 weeks ago
Yes! When my husband asked me if I wanted to see boyhood I said something like "I'm not interested in any more stories about a (white) boy's journey to manhood." He said, "well what's wrong with that story?" Nothing of course, but that's ALL THERE IS.
Thank you.

I also think it's fascinating that The Grand Budapest Hotel (which I did quite like) is being marketed/talked about everywhere as the story of the concierge (Ralph Fiennes, a white dude) when for me, it is entirely the story of the lobby boy (Tony Revolori, a not white dude). It reminds me of when Hailee Steinfeld was nominated as a supporting actress rather than lead actress for True Grit -- she was so obviously the lead, but they posed white dudes as the lead. Ugh.
3 replies · active 531 weeks ago
Agreed on this (both movies actually), I felt like the lobby boy was definitely the lead character.
Absolutely. He's the lead. Plus, he's the one telling the story (in the guise of future him F. Murray Abraham). Also he gets the best moment in the film, telling Gustav how he came to be in the country by himself.
Owweee my heart in that scene! It's a glorious moment.
PLUS: As a projectionist (the kind that threads film and does manual changeovers) I fucking love, love love the play with aspect ratios.
Very well said, as always!
Why does everyone seem to be forgetting that Alan Turing was gay and that Stephen Hawking suffers from a major disability? Are race and gender the only axes of oppression?
3 replies · active 532 weeks ago
Well, yes, but the nominees themselves are still overwhelmingly straight, cis, and able-bodied. By and large, gay and disabled characters continue to be opportunities for actors to show off their talents by playing an "other." (I am saying this as someone who enjoyed both movies and thought that Cumberbatch and Redmayne were quite impressive-- although Cumberbatch indulged in some scenery-chewing).
There's something to be said that this doesn't reflect so much back on the people being rewarded, though. This isn't going to reward disabled actors, say. While I think it's really important that we don't ignore that disability and sexuality need to be talked about as more than tokens, and I definitely noticed people 'forgetting' that there were biopics about a (white) gay man and a (white) disabled man nominated, I think it's also important to look at who TELLS stories, as well as who the characters in them are. Are we only comfortable with things like disability and sexuality if they're things we can reward people for 'experiencing' and then putting away?

A lot of what I've seen around the Hawking biopic seems to be about the incredible difficulty an able-bodied actor has gone through pretending to be disabled for a bit and how he 'learned a lot' and is so admiring of disabled people.

But honestly, 'the Oscars have historically been VERY white and VERY male and this is bad' can 100% coexist with 'there were films including gay and disabled people nominated'. A criticism of snubbing and overlooking people of colour and women doesn't necessarily mean seeing those things as unimportant, just that it doesn't somehow balance out the white male overload.
Oh, please. You know better than that.
yup, this is exactly the issue

I would add that, even though for most people the foreign film section doesn't matter, Abderrahmane Sissako's nomination for Timbuktu is notable. He's only the third African-born filmmaker nominated for best foreign film, and of those, he's the first black one.
(also this was probably the best movie I saw all year so I'm just super glad it got recognition)
What I can't get over is how mediocre so many of the nominations and performances were. It's not like there were so many balls-out fabulous movies about straight cis white people that we didn't have room for anything else.
Thank You for this. I agree that movies of all genres need to be made with people embodied in all colors, sizes, and gender identities.And I also think it is very important that stories of racist oppression be told. Selma was about racist oppression, but it was about much more. It was also a story about a marriage and a man. It was a story about strategic political brilliance and how real historic change is made. Selma was also about the Black Lives Matter movement today. There is no excuse for its being excluded from the highest recognition, and I believe its exclusion was an act of hostility.It sickens me. The Oscars have lost all credibility. Please write your movies Roxanne. Selma will be remembered long after whatever white male approved movie takes home the Oscar. Even the controversy surrounding it will be remembered for a longer time. Please don't let haters stop you. Somehow, I suspect you won't.
It was not ambitiously chronicled over a number of years, but there is a movie called Girlhood coming out later this month. It's about French teenage girls of color and it's flipping AMAZING.
4 replies · active 531 weeks ago
It looks great and the lead actress is gorgeous.
YES! I want to talk about this movie! everyone should watch it! I loved the opening scene, showing the strength and toughness of the girls on the football field and their vulnerability increasing on the way home while passing groups of boys as their own group dispersed.
One thing I love about this film is that almost every boy is a goddamn asshole in a very real way. The scene where they were mocking the girl who lost the fight made me furious, and I'm sure it happens every single day everywhere around the world.
yeah, so much of that was frustratingly relatable! I also like how the movie shows these really tender moments of the girls' relationship while also showing them as bullies, and how it makes you understand how this is one of the only ways for these girls to feel strong and in control. The scene where the main character hangs out with her drug dealer group as the only girl and takes part in the harassment of a passing girl stood out to me. On the one hand your heart breaks for her, because you remember her as the loving older sister from the earlier parts of the movie, but you also get what makes her act like that.
Right on as usual.
I remember seeing these movies' posters all over the tube throughout the year, and thinking "God, our culture has such an obsession with stories about male experiences" They're nearly all told from a male point of view, about relationships between men (can't even imagine a female-led Foxcatcher, with women and sports and complex relationships). Particularly white men.

Ugh, we want different stories, and we are waiting for them. Do production theatres not think there's money in woman-centred films and films with mainly people of colour? Because those types of films are such a small minority, hence award ceremonies have less to choose from. I submit that there is a large paying public, frustrated, waiting for something to relate to. COME THE FUCK ON HOLLYWOOD.

Post a new comment

Comments by

Skip to the top of the page, search this site, or read the article again