Too many dang SEXY JANE EYRE adaptations out there, that’s the problem. Friends, I don’t object to sexiness qua sexiness, but Jane Eyre is a book about ugly people. If I accomplish one thing in my life, let it be the increased acceptability in casting the ugly and the weird-looking in period dramas. We would all be the better for it. Interesting things happen to people with bad bone structure, you know, and there’s something particularly ridiculous about watching Babe after Babe deliver the “poor, obscure, plain, and little” monologue to some smooth-faced Male Babe in a billowing cravat.
Also, watching Michael H. Roosevelt Fassbender ask “Do you find me handsome?” and getting “no” for an answer was one of the most ridiculous cheats Hollywood ever attempted to perpetrate on my person, and if I ever meet him I will knock him down for making me sit through that scene.
Honestly, we don’t need another Jane Eyre adaptation; what we need is an adaptation of The Wanderer, but we live in the world that we live in, and there will be more Jane Eyre adaptations shoved into our eyeballs as surely as I’m living. The point is that I don’t just want to look at a bunch of grotesques for the sake of OLD TIMEY AUTHENTICITY or what have you, the point is that Jane Eyre is a book fundamentally about ugly people. Not unattractive people – they’re very attracted to one another – but ugly.
Remember that scene when two of the Reed family’s servants sort of casually dismiss the fact that she’s a victim of child abuse because she’s ugly?
Bessie, when she heard this narrative, sighed and said, “Poor Miss Jane is to be pitied, too, Abbot.”
“Yes,” responded Abbot; “if she were a nice, pretty child, one might compassionate her forlornness; but one really cannot care for such a little toad as that.”
“Not a great deal, to be sure,” agreed Bessie: “at any rate, a beauty like Miss Georgiana would be more moving in the same condition.”
“Yes, I doat on Miss Georgiana!” cried the fervent Abbot. “Little darling!–with her long curls and her blue eyes, and such a sweet colour as she has; just as if she were painted!”
NOT TO MAKE YOU FEEL BAD ABOUT YOURSELF BUT THAT IS WHAT HAPPENS EVERY TIME WE CAST A BABE AS JANE EYRE, WE HAVE GOT TO BE ABLE TO EXTEND OUR SYMPATHY AND ABILITY TO IDENTIFY WITH SOMEONE ELSE’S EXPERIENCE TO THE NON-HOT OR ELSE WE’RE GONNA GET REAL BORING AND AWFUL REAL FAST. GOTTA CARE FOR THE TOADS. JANE EYRE IS A TOAD BOOK, AND DON’T YOU TRY TO WORK AROUND THAT BY CASTING A BUTTERFLY WITH A SEVERE HAIRSTYLE.
like, see, that’s a babe
that’s a babe
here’s another babe
babe o’clock
WHEN EVEN BERTHA IS A BABE YOU HAVE GOT YOURSELF A FUNDAMENTAL MISUNDERSTANDING OF THE TEXT, MON FRIEND
WE NEED SOME WEIRDOS IN THIS MIX. Okay, I’m not going to give you any names, because everyone currently working in the field of acting is still too good-looking to please me, but here are some casting guidelines that should help.
Jane Eyre: An electric eel, a haunted player-piano, a family Bible that smells weird and has a bunch of names written in the back that you don’t recognize, a weird bird that someone just kicked accidentally, some wet batteries
Mr. Rochester: An old boot stuffed with paper bags full of spaghetti, an angry hat, punched-up Mickey Rourke at the end of The Wrestler but without plastic surgery, a TV that’s just been turned off but is still warm
Bertha Mason: That feeling when you’ve been throwing up for ages and you know you’re going to throw up again but there’s nothing left to throw up, not even stomach acid, so you just have the horrible sensation of interior folding and retching until you can’t breathe
St. John Rivers: Yeah, go ahead and cast a babe, obviously.
Mallory is an Editor of The Toast.
Forgot password?
Close message
Subscribe to this blog post's comments through...
Subscribe via email
SubscribeComments (206)
Sort by: Date Rating Last Activity
krankor1 133p · 515 weeks ago
Unreadaethel 127p · 515 weeks ago
ppyajunebug 137p · 515 weeks ago
Plus she's an amazing actress and she had ridiculous chemistry with Toby Stephens. I WILL STAN FOR THE 2006 ADAPTATION UNTIL MY DYING DAY.
But I agree, no one has ever called Fassbender ugly in his life. I straight up laughed hysterically at that line.
emilykayvotruba 81p · 515 weeks ago
supernanify 114p · 515 weeks ago
beagee · 515 weeks ago
builtahouse 123p · 515 weeks ago
OH for Hugo Weaving as a Rochester who has "magnetism" in the bag, even if stupid normal people didn't understand.
(obviously there is still 2000% too much babe in all adaptations, though Fukunaga's St. John was appropriately babesque.)
cosetthetable 121p · 515 weeks ago
scritchproductions 95p · 515 weeks ago
http://pics.filmaffinity.com/Jane_Eyre-809072053-...
muttershanks 102p · 515 weeks ago
mmcoulston 134p · 515 weeks ago
She ended up being one of my favorite teachers and this was the first sign of life. It was awesome.
thezlot 120p · 515 weeks ago
goonerkate 99p · 515 weeks ago
ElectricHarpsichord · 515 weeks ago
caroline · 515 weeks ago
Sean_Sullivan 142p · 515 weeks ago
“Good! but not quite the thing,” I thought, as I surveyed the effect: “they want more force and spirit;” and I wrought the shades blacker, that the lights might flash more brilliantly—a happy touch or two secured success.
AnatheHated · 515 weeks ago
lizardjellybean 112p · 515 weeks ago
I mean come on. Perfect. Make that face more.
bluewindgirl 111p · 515 weeks ago
rolotomassi5 103p · 515 weeks ago
raqueue 115p · 515 weeks ago
Perdita McLeod 112p · 515 weeks ago
I just came here to say this is upsettingly accurate.
perianwen 105p · 515 weeks ago
Jane Eyre: some wet batteries
Mr. Rochester: An old boot stuffed with paper bags full of spaghetti
kickstarter y/n?
Lizzie_Sidds 150p · 515 weeks ago
painterstape · 515 weeks ago
constancecg 125p · 515 weeks ago
typewriterandgramophone 124p · 515 weeks ago
Mira · 515 weeks ago
CleverManka 143p · 515 weeks ago
So yes yes yes in theory to all of this but those two had such amazing chemistry that I am able to overlook (and did overlook) any other quibbles about that production.
Wiccy · 515 weeks ago
Put Ciarán Hinds' Rochester with Ruth Wilson's Jane and you have pretty perfect casting in my book.
yda · 515 weeks ago
theatticwife · 515 weeks ago
ladonnapietra 115p · 515 weeks ago
beakbreath 131p · 515 weeks ago
blady · 515 weeks ago
Kat · 515 weeks ago
I have a lot of pain about Heathcliff in this respect too.
surelyblossom · 515 weeks ago
CurrerHell 73p · 515 weeks ago
Oh ha ha, I do like to laugh.
menysnoweballes 99p · 515 weeks ago
Bookwench · 515 weeks ago
cleoreads 105p · 515 weeks ago
margotayer 54p · 515 weeks ago
EvaGR · 515 weeks ago
Sophia McDougall · 515 weeks ago
Like when she's all happy and in love and glowing Rochester is like WHOA, DID YOU DO SOMETHING TO YOUR HAIR, YOU LOOK HELLA HOT TODAY, and Diana is all "No, the problem with you marrying St John is not that you're not in his league, because you ARE. The problem is that he wants you to die of cholera in India."
And honestly when she's drawing Rochester and it's all "strong chin" that and "straight eyebrows" this and "flashing dark eyes" the other it's hard to work out HOW exactly he's not handsome. About the most unhandsome I can imagine to fit the description is a late 30s Gordon Brown, who really wasn't so bad.*
Lucy Snowe, though, I do think needs to be played by a character actress who definitely does not have leading lady looks.
*A thought! Instead of fantasy casting actors, fantasy cast politicians! A class of people in the public eye who look weird to normal and we get to say so!
Either_Ada 139p · 515 weeks ago
YES. I recommend this book so much I should probably just get business cards printed up that say "Read The Wanderer or Either_Ada will plague you about it forever, even from beyond the grave." I would settle for everyone watching the movie instead.
There is not enough recognition for that book or Charlotte Smith in the world. The only thing I am certain I agree with Wordsworth about is that she was a poet "to whom English verse is under greater obligations than are likely to be either acknowledged or remembered". And I would say ditto to English novels.
jenny · 515 weeks ago
And Rochester was described sort of Heathcliffy, I thought - all wild and moody and unkempt but he sure cleaned up nice when the ladies came a'calling.
si_rosenbaum 120p · 514 weeks ago
al3ab-banat01 87p · 463 weeks ago
unleashthedandy 0p · 457 weeks ago
Although not at all hideous, yet not handsome either, PAUL GIAMATTI must be a rightful intense Rochester. He's a specialist in playing angry, abrasive characters.
I wish, I wish.
Post a new comment
Comment as a Guest, or login:
Comments by IntenseDebate
Reply as a Guest, or login: