Gal Science: An Archaeologist on Bone Health -The Toast

Skip to the article, or search this site

Home: The Toast

As The Toast searches for its one true Gal Scientist, we will be running a ton of wonderful one-off pieces by female scientists of all shapes and sizes and fields and education levels, which we are sure you will enjoy. They’ll live here, so you can always find them. 

First, my disclaimer: I am not a doctor. Yes, I study bones and exercise, and I do act like a know-it-all, but whatever I tell you can not be taken as a replacement for medical advice. This shouldn’t be shocking to most people, as it says “archaeologist” pretty clearly on my business card. What I practice – and am working towards my doctorate in – is bioarchaeology, the examination of human remains in archaeological contexts. My research gets even more specific, combining bioarchaeology with biomechanics and exercise science, studying how movement affects bone density, shape, and structure. I apparently make a pretty shoddy running partner as I’m always commenting on how people run, and a weird party guest because I encourage everyone to show me the crazy things they can do with their joints and muscles, but also a good half-doctor when friends are too busy or lazy to make a physio appointment when they break themselves. (The answer is always RICE, and once in a blue moon, get an x-ray so I can add your injury to my teaching collection.)

My research is pretty niche: I’m looking at social divisions of labor among ancient inhabitants of Nubia, or northern Sudan, and variations between hunter-gatherers, farmers, and pastoralists. I get to examine hundreds of ancient leg bones (primarily the tibia, or shin bone) using a 3D scanner. The tibia is particularly useful because it’s vertically oriented and responds to activity – the femur (thigh bone), especially in women, is often angled to accommodate wider hips, and bone changes have been shown to correlate more with body size and climate.

To figure out how ancient people used their bones and muscles, I look at lots of research on both bone chemistry and sports science. The fact that amazes people the most is that your bones are not static – they grow and change in response to your lifestyle. A study that makes this quite clear examined adolescent girls playing tennis. Tennis is basically a one-armed sport: unless you’re ambidextrous, you use your dominant arm (not to be anti-lefty, but most of the time it’s the right arm) for serving, forehand, and most of the support for backhand. So the researchers were able to see a clear change in bone mineral density over time between the dominant arm and the other arm – in some cases the bones of the dominant arm were up to 15% denser. (They were also tested against controls, who saw no difference between arms and lower bone density overall.)  I’m looking at the same concept, but in individuals who lived and died between 5000 and 1500 years ago. I can see clear differences between individuals – some have tibias that are long and pointy in cross-section, and others that are rounded and teardrop-shaped. Some of these differences are based on sex and size, and others are due to the types of activity they practiced.

Screen Shot 2015-03-25 at 10.51.53 AM

Image: Tibial cross-sections. Left: a teardrop-shaped tibia and right: a sharkfin-shaped tibia. Courtesy The British Museum and thanks to Thomas Davies.

How does this work? There are two types of cell responsible for bone maintenance – osteoblasts and osteoclasts. Osteoblasts build bone, and osteoclasts take it away. The body is highly responsive to changes in activity, and bone is constantly updating itself accordingly. The general principle is that your body thinks what’s happening now will happen forever. In response to more activity (known as physical stress), bone will accumulate more osteoblasts to strengthen itself. Each step makes tiny microfractures, which tells the bone “Come on, I’m breakin’ here! Give me more strength!” and the osteoblasts pile on. In the absence of activity – during periods of prolonged sitting or lying down – the osteoclasts come in to take away unnecessary bone. Generally it gets sent out of the body in your urine. The basic principle is that the more activity you do, the stronger your bones will be. Studies of astronauts show that even a few days in space, where you don’t need to do physical work because you can just wear socks and sweats and float around, will sap bones of their mineral content, and it can take up to years to replace that bone. The interesting thing about this osteoblastic cycle is that – as mentioned above – it can actually change the shape of the bone. Another study has shown differences in tibia shape between runners and hockey players – because the runners put more stress on their tibias in a consistent front-to back direction and the hockey players put more stress on their tibias side-to-side, the osteoblasts have strengthened their tibias in unique ways to accommodate that stress. The corollary of this is that we can observe similar shapes in ancient humans and estimate activity patterns.

But wait! There are always caveats. The best time to build bone is right around puberty, during the adolescent growth spurt. Yes, the time when you might get your period any moment and you smell terrible and your limbs are flying around all uncoordinated – this is when you needed to be doing the most exercise. (But watch out! Too much exercise, especially combined with eating disorders – I’m looking at you, ballet and gymnastics – and your periods stop and your bones get weaker.) Bones continue to grow with less velocity until the early 20s, stopping slightly earlier in women than men, and generally have completed their growth (in both length and density) by age 25. Sorry, over-25s: it’s all downhill from here. Archaeologically, adolescence was often the time when young people would start to take up adult social roles and “occupations”, if they hadn’t already, so we can see what they would probably have been doing for the rest of their lives.

So, osteoporosis. Where does that enter the picture? Let’s first do some definitions. Osteoporosis is a clinical condition where the bones are 2.5 standard deviations below average bone mineral density (BMD), or the amount of calcium in keys regions like the hip and lower back. Low BMD puts people at risk for serious fractures. Average BMD is generally stated to be 1 g/cm2, but it varies by age and sex. Another method is hand examination of a hip x-ray to count the number of trabeculae, or struts of bone cells, in each direction. This method, called the Singh index, could possibly be more useful for detecting differences between and within populations. Osteopenia is the pre-diabetes of osteoporosis: it’s 1-2.5 standard deviations below the mean. It’s important to note that osteoporosis is not a disease in itself but a risk factor for fractures.

There have been numerous articles written about women and exercise. I often get emails from my mom and her friends with the latest from WebMD, usually with headlines like “Scientists Recommend Extra 23 Minutes of Vigorous Exercise to Promote Bone Health” or “These 15 Foods and 5 Exercises Prevent Bone Loss” or “Will Drinking Water Increase Bone and Hair Health?”. They, as perimenopausal women, want to know what to do with this mass of sometimes contradictory information. I will now tell you the Secret Tricks to Maintaining Bone Density Doctors Don’t Want You to Know: you had to build it in puberty, and you have to keep exercising to maintain it. As far as my research has shown, you can keep building bone and increasing bone density up until your 20s. After that, you can maintain or decrease your bone density. It’s quite easy to decrease bone: just do nothing. To maintain it, you need weight-bearing exercise. Osteoblasts respond to microfractures, so the way to keep those osteoblasts occupied is by running, jumping, bouncing on your bosu, Zumba, those crazy-intense boot-camp push-ups. Things that (sadly) will not work: cycling, swimming, yoga. Not that those aren’t healthy activities! They are still excellent for the heart, for weight maintenance, for stress. But they do nothing for your bones.

And then there’s menopause, that scourge! Estrogen – the surge of which is partly responsible for bone growth at puberty – significantly decreases at menopause, negatively impacting bone density; additionally, normal age-related changes include more faulty chemical signaling and hormones running amok, causing irregular calcium and phosphate processing.  At this point, doctors usually recommend that women take up weight-bearing exercise, but it may already be too late by then and they may be diagnosed with osteopenia. My mom had some bone scans taken over the last few years, presented below:

Screen Shot 2015-03-25 at 10.54.48 AM

At age 49, her BMD was almost 1 g/cm2. Two years later, as she entered perimenopause, it had decreased by 1.5%. Three years after that, it had decreased an additional 5.6%. Wondering what had happened in the intervening years to cause the drop, I figured it out pretty quickly: she had a hysterectomy, sending her into sudden artificial menopause. Fortunately she’s very active, going for long walks multiple times a day, which has probably protected her bones to some degree.

So, what can you do to promote bone health? There are a number of recommendations around the web, including eating eggshells, leaping like fleas, consuming 1200 milligrams of calcium daily, and taking various supplements. The problem with taking supplements is that if you aren’t actively processing the calcium, you’ll just pee it out. The key to finding an exercise that promotes bone growth (or at the very least, preserves the bone you have) involves examining how bones grow in youth: in response to microfractures. This means weight-bearing activity with some active component – running, jumping, jogging, step aerobics. “But running is bad for your knees!” you argue. If you already have knee problems, running may not be the best activity for you; go for a walk instead. However, research shows that ground surface has a significant impact on ground reaction force and the pressure on your joints. Asphalt has basically the least impact absorption, which means every pounding step on a road echoes up through your joints. Running on dirt paths or grass will ease joint pain quite a bit. Additionally, running confers numerous benefits to heart and muscle health, and even gives older runners the energy efficiency of 20-year-olds. If you join a running club, there’s also the benefit of finding new social circles. (Secret: I find running alone really boring, so I always run with friends or in groups!)

The conclusion: running is really great for you. It may be the fundamental human activity, practiced since the dawn of bipedalism. I have yet to attain that “runner’s high” everyone talks about, but I know every time I go out for a run I’m encouraging my osteoblasts to get down to work and give me nice strong legs and tibias identifiable by future bioarchaeologists. (The beastly calf and thigh muscles are also worth it too.)

Stacy Hackner is a bioarchaeologist and PhD candidate at University College London. In her rapidly vanishing free time, she engages visitors at UCL’s three small museums and has previously talked at a comedy night for museum professionals.

Add a comment

Comments (44)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
Bioarchaeology! SQUEEE!!! *goes back to read article*
This is really really interesting, and a timely reminder that I need to get back into running (or the molasses-speed-chug that is my version of running. So slow.). Have your research findings been gendered at all? Or have you seen more variation based on socio-economic factors?
4 replies · active 522 weeks ago
+1 for "molasses-speed-chug". With the exception of the proverbial molasses in January (which speed is known to be 35 mph (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boston_Molasses_Disaster)), that describes me and running perfectly.
Don't even get me started on the BMD (although I often mess up and call it the Boston Molasses Massacre a la Alice's Restaurant.)
o/~ You can get all the molasses you want/ at Boston's Restaurant! o/~
"Molasses" is actually the recommended speed for fat burning, according to some studies! The ideal speed for building muscle and endurance, though, is slightly faster: you should be just barely out of breath when having a conversation. I'm pretty middling as well! It's not all about speed, I keep saying.
I've found differences between males and females all the archaeological groups I'm examining. The most robust (strongest) are the male pastoralists, then the female pastoralists, and both groups are much stronger than the farmers from a similar time period. Among the farmers, the males were clearly doing a lot more walking or mobile work than the females, which could indicate changes in social roles with increasing agricultural development. Those pastoral ladies were leggin' it. The "elite" group I looked at were the weakest of all, and were probably living in a large enough society that they didn't need to be doing so much physical labor.
This means weight-bearing activity with some active component – running, jumping, jogging, step aerobics.

Wait, so weight-lifting and push-ups and the like — the not-aerobic stuff I mentally categorize as "static exercise" — don't build bone density? Aw, man, time to come up with a new exercise plan. Thanks for the heads-up!

Bone stuff is fascinating, isn't it? We didn't work with human remains, but for my minor in archaeology, I did a (text only) section on paleopathology, including a study of some medieval nuns' sinuses during a semester when I had the worst sinus infection of my life, which gave me an unpleasant but affecting sense of commonality with them.
5 replies · active 522 weeks ago
Apparently science says that you should hop up and down (especially if you are a mouse). But there's some evidence that weights and resistance training do benefit some people; they just don't seem to know who or why.
It's the vibration that does it! Causes tiny microfractures which induce rebuilding in the osteoblasts. It's actually the concept behind the Shakeweight... although that doesn't actually work, so I'm told. (It does work if your goal is to look totally ridonkulous.) Weights and yoga are important for building flexibility and muscle density, which all have protective health benefits.

I'm actually at a phys anth/paleopath conference right now. The awesome TB and syphilis photos I've seen today...
Ugh, science is supporting burpees. It's enough to crush the spirit.
Kjerendipity's avatar

Kjerendipity · 522 weeks ago

Wait. What? I need to know more about this nun sinus thing, please. I just googled "medieval nun sinuses" (autocomplete had no idea what to do with me) and -- shockingly -- nothing relevant came up.
I don't know about nuns, but monks often suffered from DISH (diffuse idiopathic spinal hyperostosis), which is linked to an overly rich diet.
oh man my bones can not be in good shape. If only listening to the Smashing Pumpkins and crying counted as weigh bearing exercise as this is what i spent my teen years doing. "You did this to me Billy!" I'll shout when I fall and break my hip.
Man, yoga, swimming and cycling are my three favorite forms of exercise.
I was under the impression from somewhere that building muscle built bone mass b/c you need bigger/stronger bones to support bigger/stronger muscles. But maybe that is more of an evolutionary "why are femurs so big/strong" and not something that applies on the individual level?
5 replies · active 522 weeks ago
this is what I thought too. maybe if we started doing yoga more aerobically?
Building muscle doesn't necessarily build bone per se, but they're still connected (and a lot of the details on a cellular level are still being worked out). They might influence trabecular architecture or have a smaller effect than weight-bearing activities. Apparently big muscle-men who try to force themselves into complex yoga positions can actually fracture their own bones by doing so (hence the NYT article "Is yoga dangerous???") but this is Not A Problem for most of the yoga-practicing population.

I was just in a bunch of lectures today on all sorts of functional morphology topics, and the answer to all your questions is "Some researcher has a good explanation, but not good enough to put the issue to rest". Especially OMG the obstetrical paradox (totally off topic, I know). But yes, that's more evolutionary.
is the obstetrical paradox the whole "why do human females have hips that can barely fit out their own babies' heads meaning more and more rely on medical science to intervene?" I am FASCINATED by that (also because it seems the shittest part of our evolution so far). What theories are being raised atm? All I've read is the pay-off between big brained children versus walking upright (smaller hips than otherwise needed for birth)..
A great quote by Holly Dunsworth of URI is that the obstetrical paradox is "elegant if true, but lacks the burden of proof." Human females have really narrow pelves and babies with really big heads. But other primates are able to walk bipedally, even if they don't always, and have massive bony birth canals and tiny baby heads (http://rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/royptb/370/1663/20140063/F2.large.jpg). So there must be other factors. She suggests gestational timing and availability of nutrients.
Also, science basically changes its mind every couple years, so watch this space.
I just recently started running, woo!

But I spent my teens/early 20's really sedentary. Eek.
At first glance, I thought that the photo at the top was Tobias in his mole costume from "Arrested Development". I am disappoint.



Fascinating article, though!
Aw fudge I hate running so much.

Can I just keep walking? A lot?
2 replies · active 522 weeks ago
This would work, right?
Yeah, running's OK, but I'm much more of a walker. Maybe we should just walk...more forcefully?
Rice???
3 replies · active 522 weeks ago
Rest, ice, compression, elevation. Standard for sprains and twists and whatnot.
I've been informed since I wrote this that the Medical Establishment now recommends PRICE (the P is for Protection). I apologize to anyone who came down with sprained ankles and mistreated them in the last 3 hours.
Thank you! I'm making risotto for dinner anyway, in case it helps.
Um, pretty sure living Paleo builds bone density and cures osteoporosis (the whole RICE thing was confusing LOL). Obviously CrossFit's a game changer for living your #bestlife, including strong bones, but I assume the Nubian royalty had bone broth every day. Sad that that's not norm anymore and it's why America is getting sicker. Thanks Obama.

ETA: Sorry, my evil Paleo-doing alterego wrote that. This was really interesting! I'm actually really curious about what the bone densities of your subjects can tell you about their development and typical activities and would love to read more about it.
I don't get it about running, though, I mean, does that mean I should also run on my neck and hands? Like.... how does forcefully pounding my legs affect the bones in my upper body?
I also was very perplexed about rice until I saw the above comments! haha!
1 reply · active 522 weeks ago
I have to break this down into bullets just to get it straight in my head, there are so many factors:
-Astronauts in orbit lose something like 10% of bone density within a few weeks. However, it's lost mostly from the legs, arms, and trunk -- not from the skull or inner ear bones.
-Why do these bones react differently if they're all made of the same building blocks?
-Hypothesis 1: Leg bones, due to walking/daily life, are much stronger above baseline density than other bones. Thus most of the extra density can be sapped from there, bringing them back to baseline. Arms actually have a lot more density than we give them credit for. The trunk is bolstered by any activity that affects the legs (vibrations go all the way up).
-Hypothesis 2: The bones in your head and ears is fundamentally different from that of the rest of the skeleton.

Solution: Unless you plan on taking up hockey or tennis late in life, your arms should reap the benefits of normal, everyday washing dishes, opening doors, and carrying stuff.
Just an anecdote (anecdata?), but I am 44 and have practiced aikido, a martial art that involves a lot of falling down, for 20 years. I recently had hip surgery (because falling down a lot for 20 years has consequences, yo) and the surgeon told me my bone density was "like we see in young male athletes." Apparently they had quite a time hammering me back together because my bones were so strong. So maybe stuff like judo, gymnastics, and aikido are also helpful for preserving bones? I can certainly imagine a lot of microfractures happening.
1 reply · active 522 weeks ago
Cool! That's amazing! Would be great to track your BMD over the next 15 years.
Now I want to know what shape the bones are in my charcot foot compared to my regular bones!

Also if i should be taking calcium supplements. I should....probably go see my orthopedic surgeon about that.
Stacy, this is a terrific column! It's interesting, relevant, and clear. Now I want to hear more about your research. So cool.
1 reply · active 522 weeks ago
Thanks! I've got more blog posts here http://blogs.ucl.ac.uk/researchers-in-museums/201... and my launch page https://about.me/stacytg
Also I tweet! @stacytg
This is fascinating! So, let's say that I was very active in early adolescence, but (hypothetically, of course) have spent the almost-decade since then sitting on the couch. Have I lost any of the benefits from that early activity by now, and should I give up and resign myself to slowly wasting away until my skeleton crumbles to dust in front of my computer?
1 reply · active 522 weeks ago
There isn't a lot out there on baseline density, but my argument is that there's a general baseline BMD that can be assumed based on sex, ethnicity, and childhood diet, among other factors. Adolescence is the key time for adding to that baseline. So let's say you raised it 25%. That shouldn't decrease by more than .01% over the next ten years, given that you're (I assume) a young healthy person. It really shouldn't decline more than .05% a decade given normal activity. BUT you can completely eliminate that loss until menopause by exercising. (They sound like small quantities, but only a few percentage point below baseline puts you into osteopenia territory.)
Ladies I am so impressed with the scientific inquisitiveness and general knowledge of The-Toast readership. I promise I will reply to all comments as soon as this conference gives me a free minute. In the meantime I am meeting some of my scientific lady idols.
astragali4lyfe's avatar

astragali4lyfe · 522 weeks ago

Stacey, amazing research. Bones are definitely the most interesting thing to study! The three dimensional work sounds really interesting, love to hear more about it here if you're not too tired of repeating it over and over and over at the APAAs.
Is ellipting close enough to running?

Post a new comment

Comments by

Skip to the top of the page, search this site, or read the article again