It’s Not My Fault! Your Guide to Defensive Feminism -The Toast

Skip to the article, or search this site

Home: The Toast

It has been a pretty rad week on Twitter for addressing some of the issues with non-intersectional mainstream feminism. If you haven’t seen the #solidarityisforwhitewomen hashtag started by @karnythia that’s been trending on Twitter the whole world over, you should go right ahead and check it out. Here is an article written by Mikki Kendall herself, explaining what the movement is all about.

#Solidarityisforwhitewomen speaks to the experiences of women of colour who are marginalized by the dominant white voices in mainstream feminism. It is powerful. It is honest. It is so damn important.

Before we all start holding hands and singing hopeful songs (which I’m pretty certain is not the future of any actual feminism. Which I am SO okay with), let’s talk about all of the defensive responses to calls for more intersectional feminism. (I’m going to ignore the most obvious trolls and their bile because 1) Yawn; and, 2) I’m not going to engage in the hard work of having dialogue with people that are so damn hateful.)

There’s a troubling demographic of people who resist more intersectional social justice practice — the “defensive feminists.” These folks do everything they can to debunk, derail, and distract from the issues at hand, in ways that subvert the entire point of the conversation. To them, defending feminism as it currently stands is more important than strengthening or challenging it. This group represents a significant barrier to achieving intersectional feminism, because they undermine the voices of those experiencing oppression, all while hiding under the helpful guise of self-professed “ally.”

I see you, well-intentioned, “accidental” oppressor, and I’m calling your bluff.

While these steps do give a nod to the “Derailing” style of calling shit shit, they look at specific actions rather than categories of responses that can be used to continue to exercise privilege. If you want to be a super-Defensive Feminist™, here are some quick steps for you:

Step 1: Make sure everyone knows that you aren’t one of those “oppressive mainstream feminists.” This response is all a lot about excusing yourself from the benefits of privilege. Maybe there are systems of oppression that lead to all kinds of unequal outcomes for people. But you didn’t make it that way! And you certainly don’t think that way. It is essential in these cases to take the honest confession of pain from another person, and make it all about you, real quick. Try something along the lines of “I know ____ is really hard for you, but I’m not one of the people that contributes to ____.” Whew! Now everyone knows how anti-oppressive you are, and also, everyone is paying attention to you. +1 point!

Step 2: Question the motives of the aggrieved party. I wrote about Oprah’s experiences trying to buy a purse on this site earlier this month, and about how racism is inescapable for people of colour. As some very astute commenters (Toasties? Toasters? Toastlets? Eggs on Toast? I’m hungry) observed, many of the news headlines detailing this story refer to Oprah’s “claims of racism”, as opposed to her experience of racism. Because, you know. Maybe she’s lying. Because that’s what people do. Because, as lots of commenters on this article will tell you, she’s currently promoting a movie. That’s right. Be as fucking offensive as you can in questioning the motives of a person speaking to their own deeply-felt experiences. You can do it! You’ll see motive questioning a lot in instances of assault and rape as well. Even though less than 2-8% all reports of sexual assaults are false, and even though the serious under-reportage of rape is a documented fact. Got this one? Moving along…

Step 3: Make it about your oppression instead. Did you know that straight/cis/non-disabled white women are paid less than straight/cis/non-disabled white men? Did you know that they experience all kinds of marginalization at higher rates than their male counterparts? Hopefully you do. Hopefully you understand that addressing gendered oppression is a serious component of feminism. Did you know that when you start to look at additional intersections of oppression, these stats get a whole lot worse for some people? They do. Did you know that it is possible to take an article about anti-Black racism specific to Black men, and make it all about white women? (I’ve posted Jamilah Lemieux’s takedown rather than the original article here, because I’m not offering the original the time of day). It has been done. Maybe you don’t like being an oppressor even while experiencing other forms of oppression. Well. Can you speak the loudest? Sweep other concerns from other communities under the rug in an effort to make feminism “universal”? You can? Achievement unlocked!

Step 4: Point out people’s relative privilege while ignoring their intersections of oppression. Back to Oprah’s shopping experience. Did you know that Oprah is rich? She is. Take a google at how Oprah’s wealth somehow erases her intersectional identity as a woman of colour. Wait, it doesn’t do that? Class doesn’t transcend race? Oppressions exist for people even when they have privilege as well? Don’t acknowledge that. Move on to the next step post-haste.

Step 5: Speak on behalf of a group that you are not a part of. Well, if we have to admit to the intersectional nature of feminism, surely we can at least hold onto some privilege by speaking as the expert on other people’s issues. If Hugo Schwyzer can make a career of being a definitive voice in mainstream feminist spaces while marginalizing the voices of women of colour, then there is lots of room for similar failures. Aim big, keep on keeping on.

Step 6: Talk about how not all people from the same background feel the same way. This one is helpful because lots of people speaking to their experiences of oppression have no idea that other people from their communities have varying ideas and opinions about everything. Did you know that some Black folks don’t like the use of the n-word, while others find value in its reclamation? Because I can’t tell you how many times I’ve heard this from white folks who are mad that they can’t use the word, or who don’t want Black people to use the word, or something, something, blah, blah, blah. If you are interested in having an opinion about things that are none of your business, it is important to pick a side, dig your heels in, and have a ready example of a friend, foe, or well-known figure from that community to make your point.

Step 7: Claim that any diversity represents the end of oppression and/or create some token diversity and call it a day. Barack Obama is president of the United States of America. Have you heard? Everything is post-racial. Everything is post-oppression. That is the logical conclusion to that argument. I heard of a certain women’s group at a certain post-secondary institution that invited women of colour from a (separate, racialized) school group to be a part of their fashion show fundraiser, so that they would appear more diverse. See? They know how it’s done. Tokenism masquerading as diversity is nothing new. Sometimes old tricks are the best tricks.

Step 8: Ignore, or actively work against, more inclusive social justice movements. There all all kinds of groups that claim to speak on behalf of women while actively oppressing them. Sex workers frequently have their lives put at risk by Antis and Abolitionist groups, so-called “feminist” organizations pushing for legislation that further criminalizes their work, which has terrifying real-world effects. Trans women and trans men are also often actively excluded from mainstream feminism by cissexist “feminist” actions. I can highlight these issues, but I can’t snark about these things because they are not experiences of oppression that I can speak to personally. Don’t contribute to this. It’s awful. Actively work against it.

I can, however, snark about being argued with, dismissed, and ignored in a presentation about “polite racism” by a white presenter, who was a lot more interested in making her point about my experiences as a person of colour than she was in hearing my opinion about how fucking terrifying and misguided her work was. And it worked out just fine for her. So take heart, aspiring Defensive Feminists™. There is still hope yet!

Step 9: When in doubt, plow through the critiques. Do you think you might have made a mistake? Are you considering that you maybe, possibly could do a better job of being an intersectional feminist? That this might require sitting down, shutting up, and changing your practice? Can’t have that! Feminism is yours; you are feminism. It’s hard being right all of the time, and you meant no harm. So, maybe work out a fake apology if you can muster one, but mostly just keep on doing what you are doing. Just make it more oppressive if you can. The discussion of racialization on the show Girls was a great example. Defensiveness/fauxpology/apathy, followed by more of the same. Score!

Step 10: (also known as Step When-All-Else-Fails): Cry. That’s the whole step. Just cry.

If you haven’t expired from a snark-attack by this point, I invite you to look at how ridiculous these things are when itemized in a step-by-step guide. Trust. They are just as ridiculous when they are fucking up the lives of marginalized people on a daily basis. Also, they are terrifying, often life-threatening, and continue to oppress other folks further. So, maybe read this thing again. Take a look at these ten steps. Commit them to memory. And then work real hard on doing the exact opposite. Okay? Okay.

Jessie is a perpetual grad student, studying all the social justice issues. She is a lover of all food (cheese is the only food, also bacon), critical analysis of everything all of the time, and really bad TV shows.

Add a comment

Comments (58)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
Yet To Register's avatar

Yet To Register · 606 weeks ago

Just reading this made my shoulders tense and my teeth grit, because fuck those antics and this malicious horseshit.

It is convenient to have this field guide though so I can link to it on the regular.
I really, really love this.

(Is it bad that "Achievement unlocked!" in step 3 completely cracked me up?)
2 replies · active 606 weeks ago
This was WONDERFUL, but also so, so depressing that it was necessary to be written.
I came to feminism in a very piecemeal, late in the game kind of way. One of the very first lessons I learned, and probably one of the best, is when someone you have privilege over is talking, you shut up, get out of the way, and listen closely. It's infuriating and heartbreaking that so many of my peers who have been doing feminism longer than I have still can't fucking get that.
Very often, when I start feeling defensive it's because I'm learning about something shitty I've done or perpetuated or just accepted. Defensiveness* is a reasonably reliable sign that I should shut up and listen closely and carefully.

*As opposed to outrage or anger or fury, which I typically experience when listening to someone speaking from a position of relatively greater privilege; defensiveness is a sneakier, more self-excusing voice in my head, and it is BULLSHIT.
6 replies · active 606 weeks ago
Just don't say anything. Ever.
4 replies · active 606 weeks ago
This is great, and definitely something I will bookmark and reread several times, both to make sure I don't fall prey to any of these tendencies and to refer others who unwittingly display them.
2 replies · active 606 weeks ago
I feel like we should all just start spamming social media with links to this article. Especially Tumblr. Is it just me or is Tumblr particularly rife with this crap? (or maybe I just see it more often there, who knows).
3 replies · active 606 weeks ago
I had no idea that so many white people have a burning desire to say the N word until quite recently. The mind boggles.

(I must admit I was one of those white ladies that briefly and knee-jerkedly grabbed the wrong end of the stick during that Questlove piece, but I hope I've learned not to do that again)
9 replies · active 603 weeks ago
Hey, Jessie-Lane Metz, I know I tend to rant in the comments on your articles but this time I just want to say I really appreciate that you're here writing about this stuff.

(That Kim Foster thing is just... wow)
2 replies · active 605 weeks ago
Jessie, I love this and I love getting to listen to you even when it gives me uncomfortable itchies of self-recognition. Especially then, really.
3 replies · active 605 weeks ago
"If you are interested in having an opinion about things that are none of your business, it is important to pick a side, dig your heels in, and have a ready example of a friend, foe, or well-known figure from that community to make your point."

This is soooo good.
2 replies · active 605 weeks ago
Ooooooh y'all #fuckcispeople was on some awesome shit a few days ago too (chock full of all the fuckery Jessie is talkin about here, naturally). Keep those intersectional hashtags comin, Internet!!!
Slow clap from over here, Jessie. This is great and you are great and especially appreciated in light of the fact that I know it's going to be exhausting and aggravating when someone tries to go after this article using exactly these tactics.
Desperate 's avatar

Desperate · 606 weeks ago

I understand that derailing the conversation is harmful. I do think that people sometimes do it unintentionally. Intersectional feminism is important, and vital. But if we tell people to shut up when they try to share their experience of discrimination, are we doing ourselves a disservice? Obviously, a white cis woman does not know the experiences of a black cis woman. But a black cis woman doesn't know the experiences of a trans black man, and so on. Where is the line between 'derailing the conversation' and sharing an experience of abuse and discrimination? Maybe some people are not trying to derail the conversation, but instead are doing what normal people do in conversation all the time. When someone tells you about their worst experience being stuck in traffic, what do you do? Generally, you commiserate with them. You express sympathy, then you generally like to provide a story of your own experience with traffic, perhaps as a way to vent your own feelings in a shared situation, but perhaps it's just in the hopes that the other person will understand the depths of your sympathy. Obviously, this metaphor is a simplification, but I'm struggling to find the proper words to address my concern here.

When someone else shares an experience that is not mine, but is so striking in similarity to the feelings it produces, then I understand that they cannot fully know my experience, or vice versa, but I still feel better for the mutual sharing. I feel kinship and connection. It feels good to know someone else recognizes my pain.

If I read of a situation with which I can recognize the other person's pain, but have no personal experience that seems to compare, I simply try to express my sympathy. But if my experiences are similar, and I choose to share, am I truly derailing the conversation? It hurts to be told that your pain doesn't matter, because someone else has pain that is judged to be greater. It hurts to be told that the discrimination you experience doesn't matter, because there are still others who face greater challenges. Why does it sometimes seem like a competition to be the least privileged, and therefore the most deserving of being listened to? Shall we just find the person who has faced the most discrimination, and then tape our mouths shut, only to listen to their stories of pain? What is the point of that?

And at a certain point, when we have taken in as many stories of pain and oppression as we can stand, quietly, thoughtfully, and not participating by sharing our own, what do we do next? If we are committed to what NOT to do, when do we find out what we SHOULD do? When do we start doing real things to make changes? Racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia...the list goes on, hatred and discrimination and abuse in many forms. Some of these I have been the brunt of, some I may have unwittingly been a part of. At a certain point, when do I get to do more than just expand my own knowledge, and learn to police my own thoughts and actions? When does the real change happen, and what can I do to help? This problem consumes practically every free moment I have lately, and I'm desperate for answers.
2 replies · active 495 weeks ago
Thank you for posting this, and the similar discussions that have been featured here lately.
Uh. What is "polite racism?"
2 replies · active 605 weeks ago
Daisychain's avatar

Daisychain · 605 weeks ago

Okay, so I need someone to help me understand this because while I'm only doing one or two of these steps with regards to #solidarityisforwhitewomen, I don't want to be an asshole. I disagree with the movement and it seems that that makes me a silly little white girl who hasn't checked her privelegge. In essence, my issue is that the hashtag itself is a sweeping statement. I know there are other bad ones out there that affect poc's/poc feminists, and I disagree with those too. I've always been as supportive as I can of poc's in feminism, though being 16 there's not a whole lot I can do other than sharing and retweeting stories that pop up about unequal treatment. I agree that the media has a skewed view of poc feminists, I agree that some white journalists can be toxic, but I really think that any big statement followed by a twitter storm against the actions of white feminists isn't the way to go. I'm a white feminist and I know I'm priveleged but I'm seriously trying to help, as are all the others I know, and this kind of thing makes me feel like an asshole just because I'm white. Please, please can replies not be aggressive? I'm honestly just trying to figure out why I'm on a different side to everyone else and your explanations or advice would be useful.
2 replies · active 605 weeks ago
BAM. Seriously. Great job.
Don't worry about not being able to snark about trans* experiences. Being trans* is excessively... complicated. There is no commonality of experience except for a desire for a "different" but not necessarily opposite expression of gender - take, for example, gender-fluid androgyny.

We come in all kinds of sexual orientations. Some of our families accept us, most of them don't. A few of us can "pass" for what we want to be, an even smaller number are considered appealing enough by heteronormative standards that they are allowed platforms to show everyone else that we are not all Tootsies or, worse, that vile comedic trope of frat boys wearing dresses and wigs, sneaking into sorority houses, looking to have sex.

In my case, I'm a queer Asian-American transwoman who could never be described as petite, and I can't speak to any other kind of trans* experience because all of my additional identities have their own peculiar gravities and combinatorics.

Anyways, I love what you all at the-Toast are doing here. Keep up the good work.
Thanks. As a white woman trying to keep aware of my privilege, I need to be checked like this!.

Post a new comment

Comments by

Skip to the top of the page, search this site, or read the article again