Disney To Rip Out Star Wars EU Continuity “Like A Tumor” -The Toast

There is a fervent — yet, to my mind, deeply misguided — young man at Ars Technica who has written an op-ed rejoicing at the news that Disney will be axing the majority of the Star Wars EU continuity titled, accurately enough, “Op-ed: Disney takes a chainsaw to the Star Wars expanded universe: And good riddance, because almost all of it is crap.”

I could not let this stand.

Star Wars is sacred to geeks. Characters in Kevin Smith movies refer to it as “the Holy Trilogy,” and for almost as long as Star Wars has existed, fans have wanted to know more about the universe outside of the movies—and the canonicity of all the elements of that universe is the subject of almost ecclesiastical-scale debates. The movies are unquestionably official—they are the foundational elements of Star Wars, even Episodes I-III. However, the combined mass of video games, board games, tie-in novels, cartoons, and anything else branded with a Star Wars logo occupies a lesser tier in the hierarchy: all these things are still “official” in that they carry the logo, but they are merely part of the Star Wars Expanded Universe.

The Expanded Universe—the “EU”—sprawls like a bloated dead thing with tentacles stretching in all directions. Everything is in there: Timothy Zahn’s Thrawn series (which introduced the eponymous Admiral Thrawn, as well as fan favorite Mara Jade, the former Emperor’s Hand-turned-smuggler who overcame her hatred of Luke Skywalker and became his wife). Clone Wars and The Old Republic. The Yuuzhan Vong and the death of Chewbacca. Kevin J. Anderson and all the unspeakably, unreadably bad literary atrocities for which he’s responsible.

Listen, I may have my own well-documented quibbles with the Jedi Academy series, but Kevin J. Anderson was the editor for Tales From Jabba’s Palace. Show the man some goddamn respect.

A sci-fi universe with as long a tail as Star Wars can be death for new stories, though. Finding space among the EU to make a mark without being hamstrung by established ideas is difficult, and even keeping the EU somewhat organized is challenging. Its growth has been cancerous—like a tumor, it has no plan and no organization—it simply expands, blindly, as the collective fan engine shovels in new material.

And like a tumor, Disney is going to rip it out.

Sir, I may hate what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.

Word began trickling out over Twitter last week that Disney will be drastically redefining the state of the Star Wars lore, eliminating the bifurcated mainline/EU arrangement and in its place constructing a single official canon. All things that are part of the canon are “real,” as far as Star Wars is concerned; all things not in the canon are “not real.” This eliminates the quasi-real EU tier—going forward, things will either exist officially, or not at all.

Lucasfilm employee Leland Chee, who currently maintains the internal Lucasfilm database that tracks the different elements of the canon, will be one of the folks making this decision. He tweeted that “Star Wars Canon is now determined by the Lucasfilm Story Group,” which he and fellow Lucasfilm employee Pablo Hidalgo are part of. When asked specifically whether the group’s goal was to eliminate the mainline/EU canon arrangement and its tiers of official-ness, Chee respondedwith a definitive yes. “More so than ever,” he said, “the canon field will serve us internally simply for classification rather than setting hierarchy.”

Now, no longer will there be a complex multi-level hierarchy of canonicity—there will simply be canon, and not.

YOU ADVOCATE FOR TYRANNY, SIR.

One gives the name of tyrant to the sovereign who knows no laws but those of his caprice, who takes his subjects’ property, and who afterwards enrols them to go to take the property of his neighbours.

One distinguishes between the tyranny of one man and that of many. The tyranny of many would be that of a body which invaded the rights of other bodies, and which exercised despotism in favour of the laws corrupted by it.

Under which tyranny would you like to live? Under neither; but if I had to choose, I should detest the tyranny of one man less than that of many. A despot always has his good moments; an assembly of despots never. If a tyrant does me an injustice, I can disarm him through his mistress, his confessor or his page; but a company of grave tyrants is inaccessible to all seductions. When it is not unjust, it is at the least hard, and never does it bestow favours.

If I have only one despot, I am quit of him by drawing myself up against a wall when I see him pass, or by bowing low, or by striking the ground with my forehead, according to the custom of the country; but if there is a company of a hundred despots, I am exposed to repeating this ceremony a hundred times a day, which in the long run is very annoying if one’s hocks are not supple. If I have a farm in the neighbourhood of one of our lords, I am crushed; if I plead against a relation of the relations of one of our lords, I am ruined. What is to be done? I fear that in this world one is reduced to being either hammer or anvil; lucky the man who escapes these alternatives!

The slap-dash, anyone-can-add-to-it nature of the existing Expanded Universe and its tiers is great for detail-oriented fans who want to write a Mary Sue fanfic that includes a perfectly accurate depiction of the seven prime forms of lightsaber combat, but it’s absolute poison for Disney. The company will be releasing their next Star Wars movie in 2015, and the giant swamp of the EU stretches out before them, threatening to ensnare and swallow up any potential ideas they might try to include. They need to be able to re-launch the franchise in a direction that they control, and that requires the freedom to let Empire Strikes Back writer Lawrence Kasdan pen the script without worrying about stumbling over years’ worth of baggage. In fact, Kasdan’s unfamiliarity with the EU is a strength here—and one that Disney is capitalizing on by drastically reducing the number of things he has to worry about.

Most of the EU is simply layers and layers of garbage. It’s filled with thinly veiled Mary Sue characters, ludicrous minutiae, and a ponderous and plodding history (past AND future) of the galaxy. It’s creaky under its own weight, and Chee’s pruning is a welcome change. In him, Disney has a person who intimately understands the core elements of what makes Star Wars, Star Wars.

It’s unclear at this point what in the EU will be pitched out into the trash, and what will be promoted to canon. When asked, Chee himself responded that he can’t say when fans will be able to see the results the trim’s impact on the universe’s lore. Still, it’s a safe assumption that every single bit of EU story set after The Return of the Jedi will have to go—and, for the most part, good riddance to it, because almost all of it is terrible.

Ironically, nuking all post-RotJ material would remove Timothy Zahn’s Thrawn trilogy, which Lucasfilm authorized and provided limited collaboration on. Zahn’s three books are easily the best of the often-literally-vomit-inducing tie-in novels, but they also are set shortly after the events of RotJ and deal specifically with the aftermath of the fall of the Empire. Losing them would mean losing some of the best content the EU has to offer; it would also, however, mean considerably more latitude in following up Episodes IV-VI.

Regardless of what gets kept, the chainsawing of canon is unequivocally a good thing. It’s time to dump the EU into the garbage chute and feed it to the dianoga.

In no particular order:

1. Let us ban “Mary Sue” from our vocabularies in 2014, along with Manic Pixie Dream Girl and “problematic,” as these are phrases that have lost all meaning (unless you wish to continue saying them, in which case feel utterly free to do so; I am no advocate for tyranny, unlike some people [some people named Lee {some people named Lee who write op-eds advocating for tyranny}]).

2. Lee is probably right inasmuch as Lucasfilm was never ever going to use the Thrawn trilogy as a basis for the new movies, no matter how much we secretly hoped they would, so they might as well honestly axe all the continuities they’re never going to use.

3. No minutiae is ludicrous; how dare you.

4. Oh God, does this mean that Shadow of the Empire is still canon because it’s set pre-ROTJ? You cannot take Admiral Thrawn away from me and make me keep Prince Xizor. That is cruelty beyond the limits of human endurance.

5. “Often-literally-vomit-inducing.” Sir, I oppose you with every fiber of my being but damn it all, do I love your enthusiasm, you feisty thing.

6. “Dianoga” here seems purposefully obfuscating, for someone who claims to want to trim the fat. Just call it the trash compactor monster; if you seek to be the vox populi, come by it honestly.

Please consider this an open thread for every feeling you have ever had about the Star Wars Expanded Universe continuity. Use strong language and GIFs wherever possible. Remember that I have loved you all.

[Image from Furious Fanboys but also it’s just the cover of one of the EU books so I think it’s fine to use]

Mallory is an Editor of The Toast.

Add a comment

Comments (79)

Logging you in...

Dashboard | Edit profile | Logout

Logged in as

+20 Vote up Vote down

McGravin · 586 weeks ago

If they choose to make a movie that diverges from the Thrawn storyline, I think I will be okay with that, but if they declare him to be not-canon, I fear I may have to declare Star Wars as dead to me.

Disney To Rip Out Star Wars EU Continuity “Like A Tumor”

ByDaniel Mallory Ortberg

Forgot password?

Comments (79)

Post a new comment