Let Us Now Talk Very Seriously About Oklahoma! -The Toast

Skip to the article, or search this site

Home: The Toast

Oklahoma-DVDcoverThe real question posed by Rodgers and Hammerstein’s Oklahoma! is this:

Would Ado Annie and Laurey’s problems be solved if they just set themselves up as spinsters in a romantic friendship on Laurey’s farm and dumped Jud, Curly, Will and Ali on a wagon bound for California? (All Most of the problems!)

I kid. Sort of.

Golden-age musical theater doesn’t have the most sterling of reputations for complex and thought-provoking plots. Whether this reputation is deserved is a bigger question than I intend to answer here, to be honest, but Oklahoma! is certainly not the counterexample most people would pick when arguing about it. A musical that centers on which cowboy will marry which farmer(‘s daughter) is not exactly a high-stakes one, especially when its music has become shorthand for indicating a certain kind of nerdy musical theater enthusiast. It is a fun but shallow stream in which to play.

Revisiting the show, however, it struck me that the subplot was a very light take on subjects that would have been dangerous socially had they been treated with any weight.

(As for the A-plot, well, all I have to say is that if you are choosing between a charismatic jerk and an actively dangerous stalker, maybe the right choice is NONE OF THE ABOVE, Laurey. Look, Aunt Eller has no kids and no husband in evidence, so you’re gonna inherit that farm either way. Surely you can just hire a bodyguard. Then again, when the jerk looks like Hugh Jackman, I suppose I can’t judge too hard.)

(Aunt Eller is certainly having a beautiful morning.)

For those of you not intimately up on your early Rodgers and Hammerstein, the main subplot of Oklahoma! has to do with Laurey’s best friend, Ado Annie, and her love triangle. (Clearly, Ado Annie is waiting to be cast as the heroine of the steampunk, YA reboot of this story.) On the one hand, she has Will Parker, a cowboy who is in love with her, but who is textually not the brightest light in the harbor; on the other, there is Ali Hakim, who is an unfortunate sign of things to come re: Rodgers and Hammerstein’s handling of characters of color (see also South Pacific, The King and I). While it’s not Mickey-Rooney-in-Breakfast-at-Tiffany’s bad, Hakim is pretty intensely Othered.* The play deals with race about as well as you’d expect for a mainstream commercially successful show from 1943 (not great), which means the audience is never in any real doubt about which suitor Annie is going to end up with. Will may be dumber than a bag of hammers, but he’s white.

A side note: In case you think I am exaggerating the level of Will’s mental prowess, Ado Annie’s father tells Will he needs 50 dollars in order to have permission to marry Annie. (Which is gross, though slightly less gross if you imagine Annie’s father just picked something at random he was pretty sure Will could never achieve.) Will, upon winning 50 dollars in Kansas City, promptly spends it all on gifts, one of which is actually a deadly weapon which he plans to give his prospective father-in-law because he’s unaware of its properties. Later, Hakim basically hands Will 50 dollars to avoid a shotgun wedding to Annie. Will immediately bids all 50 dollars on Annie’s picnic basket, meaning Hakim has to spend another 51 bucks help out this loon by outbidding him.

What’s really interesting about Ado Annie is that she insists she loves both Will and Ali, much to Laurey’s bemusement. Depending on the director and the actress, this declaration can go one of two ways. You can take it for what it is – to wit, Annie is in love with two people at once, and it’s her bad luck that she inhabits a time and place where polyamory is not an option. (The musical Paint Your Wagon suggests she should have just moved several hundred miles west a few decades earlier.) Alternately, you can argue that Annie just enjoys sexual attention, and has been given no vocabulary to talk about it separated from romantic love and marriage. This reading is supported by her (false) assumption that Hakim’s proposition of a night in a hotel is a de facto proposal; wanting sex and wanting marriage are equated.

Given that her subplot is a comic one, the audience is clearly meant to find Annie’s situation inherently ridiculous. Comedy is easier to achieve when treating Annie’s double love as sincere but fundamentally naive within the framework of the show. Annie in this reading is simply an indecisive flirt who is distracted by whichever of her options is in front of her. The latter reading, that it is sexual attention itself which she wants most, is a more dangerous tactic for a modern production, because it draws its comedy not from the character so much as from the fact that a female libido exists at all. Annie is comedic because she has the desire for sexual aggression without the knowledge to make it dangerous. This interpretation has a lot of historical precedent – after all, a time-honored way to deal with something scary is making it ridiculous, and female sexual desire, as we all know, is terrifying – but it will be harder for a modern production to pull off without complication.

The song “I Cain’t Say No” is the part of Ado Annie’s subplot that’s probably best known and illustrates the different ways a production can handle her plot. In a different context, the song could be a disturbing gloss on her feeling that, when faced with male desire, she has no choice but to yield. But in this case, the upbeat music, Annie’s character and, most tellingly, the lyrics all point another direction – that the conflict isn’t so much between Annie’s desires and those of her beaux, but between what she wants and what a good girl is supposed to have. After all, “she’s known what’s right and wrong since [she] was ten.”

The difference a performer can make to the character is obvious when you start to compare them. Vicki Simon’s performance in the 1998 London production (the one starring Jackman, directed by Trevor Nunn) keeps things light, though Simon certainly incorporates a very frank physicality, as in 2:25-2:30 of the video, not to mention all the leaning over and arching her back throughout.

(Though the production never follows through on the choice, tell me she is not also flirting with Laurey in this scene. I dare you.)

Simon’s Ado Annie is mostly sweet, and while she’s frankly physical, she really does believe the best of people at the same time. Annie comes off as impulsive and young, especially in this number. She’s having fun, and the consequences seem remote.

The 1955 film complicates Ado Annie through its casting. Annie is played by Gloria Grahame – the Gloria Grahame that Turner Classic Movies describes as “A femme fatale with extraordinary carnal allure.” The Gloria Grahame you might remember as hopelessly trying to distract Jimmy Stewart from Donna Reed in It’s A Wonderful Life.

(Yeah, that one. Photo via Rotten Tomatoes.)

The film buttons Grahame up tight: literally in costumes, as well as in direction and camera framing. You see strikingly little of her body during the song. But the casting isn’t a coincidence either. The question “How can I be what I ain’t?” takes on a new twist in Grahame’s version, even with a tamer second verse for Hollywood. And unlike Simon, Grahame projects actual worry about her “terrible fix.” When she seems to enjoy herself, she catches herself and looks contrite almost immediately.

Oklahoma! deals with Ado Annie’s sexuality by making it a joke or a problem. She can’t say she wants sexual attention for herself, of course, but what a woman can do is couch it in terms of “not disappointing” a man paying her such attention. She defends her actions by couching it in terms of the Golden Rule – she says she’ll “do fer him what he would do fer me.” The reframing is necessary in order to preserve Annie’s status as a fundamentally moral character who is redeemable by the end of the show. This is not to downplay that the song is actually funny – in the hands of a good actress, including the two above, it absolutely is. But unlike Laurey, who can’t decide what she wants, Ado Annie knows – she just has to talk around it and navigate the limited options for securing it. In show that constantly occupied with whether characters are in or out of sync with the community, the only way for Annie to get what she wants without becoming an outcast is to rein in her appetites.

Interestingly, the problems with Hakim and Will are both economic. Hakim exists outside the community, both because of his race and because he’s a transient peddler, but he does have capital. Will has problems holding on to money, underlining the show’s premise of cowboys as undependable wanderers in contrast to more-reliable (if boring) farmers – though it’s worth noting that the farmers are all either minor characters or women. Ado Annie’s father is perfectly willing to sell sexual access to his daughter – but it can’t be temporary, and it can’t be taken for free, as seen in both his threatening Hakim with a shotgun wedding and setting the $50 price before he’ll consent to an engagement with Will. (In Hakim’s song, “It’s A Scandal! It’s An Outrage,” he observes: “If you make one mistake when the moon is bright/Then they tie you to a contract so you make it every night.”)

Both suitors want Ado Annie on a physical level. Hakim and Annie have clearly been physically involved – not enough to ruin her, but more than would please her father or her fiance. Even the more stolid Will goes to a burlesque show in Kansas city. Annie’s desire remains entirely irrelevant to the plot, if not the comedy; the marriage can’t take place until the suitor with monetary capital (Hakim) transfers it to the suitor with social capital (Will, who is exa part of the community in a way his rival can never be).

But this still leaves the show in a sticky place. Though the danger of loving two people at once is removed when Hakim more or less throws Will at Annie and runs, Annie’s desire is still unruly. In Will and Annie’s Act II duet, “All ‘er Nuthin'” (Hammerstein, I love you, but transcribed dialects, please stop), Will directly asks whether she’ll be monogamous, claiming marriage involves renouncing “lotsa other things/A gentleman never mentions.”

They eventually come to something of an “I will if you will” arrangement, which I can’t think is the soundest basis for long-term monogamy, but you do you, crazy kids. Then again, Will feels the need to specify that his future children look like him, which suggests some other trust issues. This song is much less overtly sexual than Cole Porter’s take on more or less the same premise, “Always True To You In My Fashion,” which turns up in Kiss Me, Kate about five years later – probably because Cole Porter was Cole Porter – but Ado Annie is still allowed to be more experienced as a secondary character than a character like Laurey is allowed to be as the lead.

Though it’s usually played for ongoing comic effect, the song’s second half makes it more interesting. Ado Annie bluntly points out “With you it’s all er nuthin’./All fer you and nuthin’ fer me!” Nor can the audience really blame her for suspecting she’s getting the raw end of this deal. What makes Annie unusual isn’t that there’s a double standard, of course – it’s that she calls it out, and refuses to submit (at least for now) to marriage on terms other than equal ones. While I doubt Oklahoma! wants us to believe Annie and Will end up in an open marriage, Annie refuses to pretend monogamy isn’t for both of them, or that she’s going to tolerate a breach of a contract she was forced into accepting in the first place.

Ado Annie is basically recycled in Carrie Pipperidge in Carousel, Rodgers and Hammerstein’s next show, though Carrie comes with one large, notable difference. Her fiance, Mr. Snow, assumes she’s fooling around on him because he’s an uptight idiot, not because she actually is. Carrie, unlike Annie, is perfectly willing to buy into a conventional, exclusive marriage with Mr. Snow. (God knows why; Mr. Snow is pretty awful.) Carrie, though, probably still gives us a glimpse of Annie’s future: a ton of kids and a husband who gets more and more staunchly conservative without getting any smarter.

By then, Curley is probably out cheating on Laurey as his midlife crisis anyway, so she and Annie should have lots of time to catch up. Unlike Laurey, though, Ado Annie might be inclined to get some of her own back if Will violates the rules he himself laid down. Laurey’s solution, as described in her song “Many A New Day,” is renounce men when one of them proves disappointing. Annie’s solution, based on past experience, will be to just grab a new one who happens to be handy.

That is, assuming they don’t all have to pick up and move to California when the Dust Bowl hits, about 25 years after the play ends. Maybe Annie will get her second chance as that polyamorous California relationship after all.

*The Trevor Nunn revival dealt with this by suggesting Hakim performing Persian-ness as part of his salesmanship, and underlays his dialogue with a New York accent, at least making him semi-complicit in his place at the fringes of the community.

***

Further Reading/Viewing:

Oklahoma!: The Complete Book and Lyrics of the Broadway Musical, Oscar Hammerstein II (Amazon | Goodreads)

The 1955 film (Amazon | iTunes)

The filmed 1998 London production (Amazon | iTunes)

Amy Laburda lives in New York City. She has disappointed many friends by breaking the news that dramaturgy does not involve summoning the ghost of William Shakespeare via incantation.

Add a comment

Comments (47)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
This is really very interesting. I need to bookmark it and read it in more depth later, but right off the bat, I like your examination of the contrasting Ado Annie interpretations. I always thought, superficially, that Gloria Grahame's was cute in her really-quite-dumb girl who has naughty, rather primitive instincts that she knows ain't right. The way she's all buttoned up and stiff in her expression does speak volumes.

Also, your "About Author" is really funny. Booooo! Dramaturgy!
Yeah pretty sure ol' Aunt Eller is a friend of Ellen, as they say.
I loved this. Also, DRAMATURGS UNITE! There are dozens of us! Dozens!
This is excellent and makes me think much more strongly about the production of Oklahoma! that I did stage crew for as a high school student. (Though mostly I remember indelible paint stains and ridiculous splinters.) "Oklahoma! deals with Ado Annie’s sexuality by making it a joke or a problem."

BINGO. How many accepted works of art/literature/creativity/etc. have we seen a main plot point being "women's sexuality is a problem or a joke?" I do understand the context of the work, but I feel like this is an unusually common thing that pops up even in contemporary things.
"A musical that centers on which cowboy will marry which farmer(‘s daughter) is not exactly a high-stakes one, especially when its music has become shorthand for indicating a certain kind of nerdy musical theater enthusiast. It is a fun but shallow stream in which to play."

There is a certain type of theater kid who looks at Oklahoma! and does not see "shallow." This kid looks at Oklahoma! and thinks "what the EFF is going on with these people, they are cruel and manipulative to each other and they sublimate their desires JUST LIKE REAL LIFE" and then that kid decides to get a MFA in theatre and someday direct a "dark, honest version" of Oklahoma! and generally make a series of bad life choices.

<---self
4 replies · active 576 weeks ago
Seriously, the hero tries to convince his romantic rival to commit suicide THIS IS NOT A FUN STORY.
As a fellow theater MFA, I would gladly pay to see your Dark Honest Version of Oklahoma.
I too want to see your dark production! It's funny, because I read it a little differently in terms of "what the eff is going on with these people." By reaching into the past, I see Rogers and Hammerstein (and to some extent Riggs, the author of the source material Green Grow the Lilacs) trying to present a (fictional) collective "American" heritage (read: white, anglo, etc); one that evokes the (again, fictional) simplicity of times past. And the deliberate and much-vaunted "folksiness" of the play, the music, the musical, the costumes, etc; all of this resonates with the romanticization and primitivization of rural, white communities, ascribing to them a sort of childlike level of understanding and emotions. So, I guess I read it as the youth of the characters (and Laurie is explicitly described by Riggs as "silly" though she grows up over the course of the play, for example) and the "taming" and "civilization" of characters like Curly and Will and even Ali (taming via marriage and "settling down" with farm or merchant women), as paralleling the youth of the country.

tl;dr: I see it as a kind of coming of age story of the characters and, allegorically (though not subtly) the imagined nation of the mythical Western Frontier.

PS, I may have written an article on this (almost ready to submit for publication!). Though it doesn't include most of the above, which your comment made me think of! So, THANK YOU!
Request: an analysis of the sociopolitical/economic implications of "Paint Your Wagon". I mean come on, Clint Eastwood singing AND a MMF marriage?
3 replies · active 580 weeks ago
Gonna paint a wagon
Gonna paint it fine
Gonna use oil-based paint
Because the wood is pine
I actually had this in my head just yesterday, before reading this post and its comments.
Oh Paint Your Wagon. The glory of Marvin & Eastwood and the reason Mariah Carey was named Mariah (you know... like the wind)
AHHHHHH IS THIS A SERIES/CAN IT BE ONE PLEASE???!? I really love in-depth musical theatre analysis like this, so if you have other similar writings direct me to them now please!

Also this storyline gets semi-recycled again in Kiss Me, Kate with Lois and Bill? Dumb guy with money problems pursues self-professed floozy? Except that Lois makes no excuses or apologies for herself. She and Ado Annie should team up Thelma and Louise-style.
3 replies · active 580 weeks ago
Elevended.
(Author here under an older sign in handle.) I'm so glad you have interest! I certainly have more thoughts about musical theatre, so if there's an appetite for it, there's definitely a strong chance I may pitch more pieces like this one in the future.

100% agree about Kiss Me, Kate and Lois/Annie's cross-universe adventures.
I used to love everything about Gloria Grahame (she was a fine actress) but then I read her bio and she totally has this shocking Scandals of Classic Hollywood life. She had an affair with (raping) her 13 year old stepson while she was married to his father. Sure, she later married the son, when he was of age and had kids with him. Wooo, that makes it all better, right?
I have a really hard time reconciling all of that and avoid watching her movies.
But what about the dream ballet and its depiction of prostitution? I love this musical beyond all reason, and yes, please, make this a series!
2 replies · active 580 weeks ago
yes. More about the bizarre and creepy dream ballet. Haunted me for years of my childhood. Also, (spoiler!) Judd falling on the knife so that Curley's not the *actual* murdering bad guy. . . yeeeeesh.
Really good point! I tried to mainly stick to Ado Annie's subplot, but you're absolutely right that Laurey's arc has a lot to say about women's sexuality/desire too. That ballet is way loaded.
This is marvellous; more please.
"who is an unfortunate sign of things to come re: Rodgers and Hammerstein’s handling of characters of color (see also South Pacific, The King and I)."
See also also, Flower Drum Song?
Can you do one of these and cover the original and the revival/DHH version? That would make my month? Year? Something? All of the things?!
1 reply · active 581 weeks ago
My son's first high school production was Oklahoma! and the next year they did South Pacific. I had so many thoughts. So many.

(Including "I'm glad they did Shrek this year.")
Can anyone explain the name Ado Annie to me, though? I mean, "Ado"? Ay-doe? Is that really a name? Thank you.
I HAVE NOTHING OF CONSEQUENCE TO ADD TO THIS other than the fact that I saw the West End production in London when I was 12 and felt like the coolest kid in the WORLD for already knowing who Hugh Jackman was when X-Men came out the next year.
Loony_Lovegood's avatar

Loony_Lovegood · 581 weeks ago

Hello, awesome new friend! Can you please please give Seven Brides for Seven Brothers the same treatment next? My family doesn't understand why I hate it, and I tried to explain and they just laughed at me and brushed off my objections. It was terrible. :-/
2 replies · active 580 weeks ago
Brunhilde at the bar's avatar

Brunhilde at the bar · 580 weeks ago

Oh my GOD I love 7BF7B so so much but it is a fucking sick and twisted movie. Or play.
My undying love for redheads and dance sequences is at war with every other part of myself when it comes to this movie.
I remember RUNNING through the dorm to my friend's room when the Hugh Jackman version was on PBS so we could watch it and squee.

(My mom went to school with Hammerstein's granddaughter! WOO BRUSHES WITH FAME)
Oklahoma, Kiss Me Kate, and Show Boat basically convinced me as a young theater geek that All Altos (or B Plots) are about loose women. Therefore, All Altos (or B Plots) are MUCH more interesting.

Please oh please do Show Boat or South Pacific next!!
1 reply · active 580 weeks ago
See also: "Never fall in love with a gambler (especially if you are an alto)."
Seconding all the requests to make this a series!!! Please?
What does the "Ado" part of "Ado Annie" mean? I have never understood this.
4 replies · active 580 weeks ago
I hope you find an answer. :D I asked the question above, but no one's ventured an explanation. I suspect there is none! Are we the only ones ever to wonder?
I've never heard a definitive answer to this! A lot of internet people have the same question, though. They don't explain it in the show, so this is speculation, but I've heard suggested that it's connected to worry/trouble (as in "Much Ado About Nothing"), which given her father's view toward her, seems to make some sense. R&H did carry the name over from the original play ("Green Grow The Lilacs"), I know, but if anyone finds a real answer, I'd also be interested.
Ah, that's interesting; thanks. What a puzzle! A major(-ish) character in a major American classic musical has a name that seems nigh-on unfathomable, and peoples just go along with it... it's never explained. This is a minor phenomenon in itself to me.
OK, you may have seen this, too (http://www.broadwayworld.com/board/readmessage.php?boardid=2&thread=938904#). The second-to-last commenter says:
"I've managed to find some history from an Oklahoma county historical society newsletter. According to it, the name came from the original playwright, Lynn Riggs.

Riggs was a literary genius at recording the expressions of plain Oklahoma people. Many of the characters in the play were family members and acquaintances from the area. Jud Fry was a man named Jeeter Davis who pulled a knife on a family member. Jeeter' name was changed to Jud in the play. A neighbor of the Riggs became "Old Man Peck." Two daughters of Mary Brice were also represented: Laura became "Laurey" and Willie became "Ado Annie," however the name "Ado" was derived from Lynn's half-aunt Hannah Ada Riggs."

(lol at citing the Oklahoma Historical Society to determine that the name came from the playwright. I know, but still.) So, I guess the answer is, "It's just a weird name that the playwright gave to the character based on a relative's name." I always kind of felt that "Ado" was serving as an adjective, but I guess it's more equivalent to a double name, i.e. Ada Annie.
I love me some Ado Annie, and I always found it refreshing that she speaks so openly about wanting the D. It's pretty obvious that homegirl doesn't WANT to say no. I mean what's she going to do, spit in his eye?
Liked that asterisk at the end--I'd always thought that Ali Hakim was faking being Persian. Which I suppose is a different can of worms...but he's not so much othered as he's a con man to the core.
HE LOOKS LIKE HE'S ASLEEP
IT'S A SHAME THAT HE WON'T KEEP
BUT IT'S SUMMER AND WE'RE RUNNING OUT OF ICE.

Oklahoma forever.
1 reply · active 580 weeks ago
That lined KILLED IT in our high school production.
GrannyMumantoog's avatar

GrannyMumantoog · 580 weeks ago

Just a few thoughts. Love the humorous ideas about Ado & her dilemma. I always thought that Ado & Will were perfectly matched since Will is dumb as a stump & Ado is so naive she doesn't have a clue that Ali is just trying to get into her pants, as he probably does in every town he goes through. You're right about the economics of Ado Annie's situation too. The story takes place at the turn of the century so women didn't have too many options to choose from...dumb cowpoke Will or smarmy, womanizing peddler Ali! Not a great choice at all!

About the way Ali Hakim talks, Lynn Riggs has written & spoken about his plays including Green Grow The Lilacs which became Oklahoma! He has noted that all the characters were derived from the people who populated his world in the late 19th/early 20th century. He spoke of peddlers like Ali, whom he characterized originally as Syrian, as having very strange accents from spending so much time traveling throughout the mid-west and talking to farmers. So R&H didn't originate the idea of his weird way of talking. It's that way in the original play, written in 1929. Actually the "book" of Oklahoma! is taken almost word for word from GGTL except that the Jud character is renamed (as someone mentioned) from Jeeter & that part of the story is much darker & more dramatic. In GGTL there are indications that he's raped & killed a couple of young women who spurned him. Actually in the original play Curly is arrested when he kills Jeeter & escapes from jail to be w/Laurey. But most of the story in Oklahoma! is verbatim from GGTL.

I did love how the '98 version with Hugh Jackman took a more realistic, less fluffy, approach to the material. Oklahoma! is one of my favorite shows and the '98 version is the best I've seen. I grew up loving the Gordon MacRae movie but always thought his Curly was way too old for Shirley Jone's Laurey. In GGTL they are both very young, constantly sparring with each other like kids and Aunt Eller loves Curly like a son. I think all these elements were brought out better in the '98 version.

Love the article!
I saw the London " Oklahoma! " ( I didn't know there was a Hugh Jackman - so that wasn't the reason, but it was a side benefit to have seen his first international theatrical foray) -- because I had been a fan of Rodgers and Hammerstein for so long and my business trip to London gave me a chance to see a live production of their work for a second time (the first one was the first revival of South Pacific at Lincoln Center). The movie version was one of the least favored of the R&H movies I had seen because I thought it was sort of boring. The RNT revival was quite a revelation that apart from the music ( and dance!), it portrayed Americana with its characters ( this was a darker look), its dialogs, and its look into the past and into the future ( although they never forecast that the future might be a little bleak, with the economic hardships that would come later).

Now I enjoy watching the DVD/BluRay often. Thanks to the foresight of Trevor Nunn - we now have another option besides the McRae/Jones version ( I watch that one also once in a while). I also happened to see a clip of Shirley Jones singing People Will Say We're in Love with Hugh Jackman at the inaugural of the FOX studios in Sydney. The songs are really timeless.
1 reply · active 409 weeks ago
Oh man, I would love to see that Jones/Jackman duet!
Good article, but I think we all are avoiding the obvious question.

Eller/Curly: do you ship it?
I love this! I've written an article about Oklahoma! so, I'm ALWAYS up for talking seriously about this musical! Especially about race--the section of my article that needs the most revision is the section about Ali and Othering. But can we talk for a second about the total absence of American Indians in, ahem, Indian Territory?

Mostly, though, I just want to say how much I appreciate your reading of women's sexuality (and fears of it) in this musical. Such a great topic! In terms of Andrew Carnes (Ado Annie's dad), I guess I always read that slightly more sympathetically, in that the $50 isn't a price for Annie per se, but rather a necessary proof that Will is a fit husband financially. Maybe? Or at least responsible enough to inherit the Carnes farm at some point? Either way, pretty gross.

Post a new comment

Comments by

Skip to the top of the page, search this site, or read the article again